Leslie W. Grant
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems
- Topics
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers)Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers)School Choice and Performance (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Leslie W. Grant
14 papers receiving 478 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Education 475
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
- Social Psychology 65
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- Information Systems 43
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie W. Grant
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie W. Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie W. Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie W. Grant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie W. Grant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie W. Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie W. Grant. The network helps show where Leslie W. Grant may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie W. Grant
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie W. Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie W. Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie W. Grant. Leslie W. Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Assessing Ways of Seeing the Past: Analysis of the Use of Historical Images and Student Performance in the NAEP U.S. History Assessment. | 0 |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | What Makes Good Teachers Good? A Cross-Case Analysis of the Connection Between Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievementbreakdown → | 380 |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | Planning, Instruction, and Assessment: Effective Teaching Practices | 4 |
| 15 | Planning, Instruction, and Assessment: Effective Teaching Practices (James H. Stronge Research-To-Practice Series) | 2 |
| 16 | Student Achievement Goal Setting: Using Data to Improve Teaching and Learning | 2 |
| 17 | Teacher-Made Assessments: How to Connect Curriculum, Instruction, and Student Learning | 36 |
About Leslie W. Grant
Leslie W. Grant is a scholar working on Education, Linguistics and Language and Demography, having authored 17 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers) and School Choice and Performance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (475 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations) and Information Systems and Management (35 citations). Leslie W. Grant has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include James H. Stronge, Thomas J. Ward, Christopher R. Gareis, Zheng Fang, Jennifer Hindman and Yanping Mo. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Teacher Education and Creativity Research Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.