Lehman Benson

984 total citations
9 papers, 494 citations indexed

About

Lehman Benson is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Lehman Benson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 494 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Decision Sciences, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Lehman Benson's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers). Lehman Benson is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers). Lehman Benson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lehman Benson's co-authors include Lisa D. Ordóñez, Lee Roy Beach, Andrew Li, Russell Cropanzano, Daphna Motro, Aleksander P. J. Ellis, Donald H. Schepers, Stephen W. Gilliland, Terri L. Griffith and David A. Tansik and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Lehman Benson

9 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lehman Benson United States 7 154 130 101 99 56 9 494
Robert A. Jako United States 8 120 0.8× 174 1.3× 38 0.4× 120 1.2× 39 0.7× 10 554
Eyal Gamliel Israel 16 128 0.8× 81 0.6× 101 1.0× 75 0.8× 196 3.5× 48 588
Chia‐Jung Tsay United States 11 121 0.8× 51 0.4× 41 0.4× 104 1.1× 32 0.6× 29 423
Kevin C. Wooten United States 14 86 0.6× 190 1.5× 48 0.5× 97 1.0× 17 0.3× 34 740
Susanne Haberstroh Germany 8 128 0.8× 46 0.4× 86 0.9× 150 1.5× 37 0.7× 14 441
H. Alvin Ng New Zealand 4 76 0.5× 122 0.9× 63 0.6× 80 0.8× 30 0.5× 7 541
Gregory J. Dardis United States 7 311 2.0× 74 0.6× 35 0.3× 226 2.3× 19 0.3× 7 551
Frank Krzystofiak United States 8 96 0.6× 102 0.8× 36 0.4× 81 0.8× 11 0.2× 19 371
Jeffrey S. Kane United States 10 88 0.6× 191 1.5× 24 0.2× 147 1.5× 14 0.3× 19 631
Tamra Pearson d’Estrée United States 7 116 0.8× 22 0.2× 173 1.7× 112 1.1× 19 0.3× 13 573

Countries citing papers authored by Lehman Benson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lehman Benson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lehman Benson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lehman Benson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lehman Benson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lehman Benson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lehman Benson. The network helps show where Lehman Benson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lehman Benson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lehman Benson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lehman Benson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lehman Benson. Lehman Benson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Motro, Daphna, et al.. (2021). Race and reactions to women’s expressions of anger at work: Examining the effects of the “angry Black woman” stereotype.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 107(1). 142–152. 50 indexed citations
2.
Motro, Daphna, et al.. (2019). Race and Reactions to Negative Feedback: Examining the Effects of the “Angry Black Woman"" Stereotype. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2019(1). 11230–11230. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cropanzano, Russell, Andrew Li, & Lehman Benson. (2011). Peer Justice and Teamwork Process. Group & Organization Management. 36(5). 567–596. 68 indexed citations
4.
Griffith, Terri L., David A. Tansik, & Lehman Benson. (2002). Negotiating Technology Implementation: An Empirical Investigation of a Website Introduction. Group Decision and Negotiation. 11(1). 1–22. 8 indexed citations
5.
Ordóñez, Lisa D., Lehman Benson, & Lee Roy Beach. (1999). Testing the Compatibility Test: How Instructions, Accountability, and Anticipated Regret Affect Prechoice Screening of Options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 78(1). 63–80. 63 indexed citations
6.
Gilliland, Stephen W., Lehman Benson, & Donald H. Schepers. (1998). A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations: Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 76(2). 113–131. 37 indexed citations
7.
Benson, Lehman, Markus Groth, & Lee Roy Beach. (1998). The Relationship Between Time Constraint and Time Pressure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 5 indexed citations
8.
Ordóñez, Lisa D. & Lehman Benson. (1997). Decisions under Time Pressure: How Time Constraint Affects Risky Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 71(2). 121–140. 201 indexed citations
9.
Benson, Lehman & Lee Roy Beach. (1996). The Effects of Time Constraints on the Prechoice Screening of Decision Options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 67(2). 222–228. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026