Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Janet GrassiaKenneth R. HammondRobert M. HammBonnie G. ColbyLarissa FastLandon E. HancockRuth Parsons
- Topics
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers)Conflict Management and Negotiation (3 papers)International Law and Human Rights (1 paper)
- Journals
- Political PsychologyInternational Journal of Water Resources DevelopmentNegotiation Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
13 papers receiving 506 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- General Decision Sciences 173
- Management Science and Operations Research 122
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- Social Psychology 112
- Cognitive Neuroscience 78
Countries citing papers authored by Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamra Pearson d’Estrée's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamra Pearson d’Estrée with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamra Pearson d’Estrée more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamra Pearson d’Estrée. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamra Pearson d’Estrée. The network helps show where Tamra Pearson d’Estrée may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamra Pearson d’Estrée. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamra Pearson d’Estrée based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamra Pearson d’Estrée. Tamra Pearson d’Estrée is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 72 | |
| 12 | 402 | |
| 13 | Direct Comparison of Intuitive, Quasi-Rational and Analytical Cognition | 7 |
About Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
Tamra Pearson d’Estrée is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (3 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (173 citations), Family Practice (33 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (122 citations). Tamra Pearson d’Estrée has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Janet Grassia, Kenneth R. Hammond, Robert M. Hamm, Bonnie G. Colby, Larissa Fast, Landon E. Hancock and Ruth Parsons. Their work appears in journals such as Political Psychology, International Journal of Water Resources Development and Negotiation Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.