Chia‐Jung Tsay

693 total citations
29 papers, 423 citations indexed

About

Chia‐Jung Tsay is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Chia‐Jung Tsay has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 423 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Chia‐Jung Tsay's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). Chia‐Jung Tsay is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). Chia‐Jung Tsay collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Chia‐Jung Tsay's co-authors include Max H. Bazerman, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Lisa L. Shu, Katherine L. Milkman, Angela Duckworth, Francesca Gino, Tami Kim, Ryan W. Buell, Fiery Cushman and Eva E. Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Management Science and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Chia‐Jung Tsay

26 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Chia‐Jung Tsay United States	11	121	104	91	68	64	29	423
Himanshu Mishra United States	14	208 1.7×	107 1.0×	90 1.0×	62 0.9×	91 1.4×	38	644
Promothesh Chatterjee United States	9	92 0.8×	69 0.7×	57 0.6×	25 0.4×	47 0.7×	19	385
Eyal Gamliel Israel	16	128 1.1×	75 0.7×	58 0.6×	25 0.4×	69 1.1×	48	588
Tessa Haesevoets Belgium	13	232 1.9×	147 1.4×	92 1.0×	140 2.1×	21 0.3×	49	557
Lehman Benson United States	7	154 1.3×	99 1.0×	40 0.4×	37 0.5×	45 0.7×	9	494
Jeffrey R. Parker United States	12	203 1.7×	80 0.8×	41 0.5×	33 0.5×	47 0.7×	31	657
Daniel Feiler United States	9	125 1.0×	64 0.6×	31 0.3×	35 0.5×	57 0.9×	18	451
Susanne Haberstroh Germany	8	128 1.1×	150 1.4×	60 0.7×	46 0.7×	44 0.7×	14	441
Stephen A. Spiller United States	12	210 1.7×	182 1.8×	74 0.8×	73 1.1×	133 2.1×	31	841
Rom Y. Schrift United States	11	131 1.1×	50 0.5×	51 0.6×	39 0.6×	45 0.7×	20	450

Countries citing papers authored by Chia‐Jung Tsay

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chia‐Jung Tsay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chia‐Jung Tsay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chia‐Jung Tsay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chia‐Jung Tsay

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chia‐Jung Tsay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chia‐Jung Tsay. The network helps show where Chia‐Jung Tsay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chia‐Jung Tsay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chia‐Jung Tsay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chia‐Jung Tsay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chia‐Jung Tsay. Chia‐Jung Tsay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2025). The influence of goal orientation on gratitude at work considering prosocial motivation. Motivation and Emotion. 49(2). 150–159.

Liu, Chengwei & Chia‐Jung Tsay. (2023). A normative theory of luck. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1157527–1157527.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2023). Talented naturals are perceived as more competent and trustworthy than hard workers. Current Psychology. 43(7). 6494–6505. 1 indexed citations

Ungar, Lyle, et al.. (2023). The trouble with talent: Semantic ambiguity in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 174. 104223–104223. 6 indexed citations

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2022). Preference for talented naturals over hard workers emerges in childhood and shapes behavior. Child Development. 94(3). 674–690. 6 indexed citations

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2022). How momentary affect impacts retrospective evaluations of musical experiences.. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 17(2). 178–192. 2 indexed citations

Liu, Chengwei & Chia‐Jung Tsay. (2021). The Variance of Variance. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2021(1). 12252–12252. 1 indexed citations

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2021). Blinded by our sight: Understanding the prominence of visual information in judgments of competence and performance. Current Opinion in Psychology. 43. 219–225. 3 indexed citations

Gino, Francesca, Jennifer A. Chatman, Leslie K. John, et al.. (2020). The Future of Employee Development: Fostering Developmental Relationships and Addressing Barriers. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020(1). 17232–17232. 4 indexed citations

10.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2019). Grit at work. Research in Organizational Behavior. 39. 100126–100126. 33 indexed citations

11.

Silva, Caroline & Chia‐Jung Tsay. (2019). Harmful Attributions: The Role of Mind Perception. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 38(9). 788–809. 2 indexed citations

12.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2018). If you’re going to do wrong, at least do it right: The surprising effect of considering two moral dilemmas at the same time. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

13.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, et al.. (2017). If You’re Going to Do Wrong, At Least Do It Right: Considering Two Moral Dilemmas at the Same Time Promotes Moral Consistency. Management Science. 64(4). 1528–1540. 16 indexed citations

14.

Buell, Ryan W., Tami Kim, & Chia‐Jung Tsay. (2014). Cooks Make Tastier Food When They Can See Their Customers. 2 indexed citations

15.

Bazerman, Max H., Francesca Gino, Lisa L. Shu, & Chia‐Jung Tsay. (2013). Reply: The Power of the Cognition/Emotion Distinction for Morality. Emotion Review. 6(1). 87–88. 5 indexed citations

16.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, Lisa L. Shu, & Max H. Bazerman. (2011). Naïveté and Cynicism in Negotiations and Other Competitive Contexts. Academy of Management Annals. 5(1). 495–518. 10 indexed citations

17.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung, Lisa L. Shu, & Max H. Bazerman. (2011). Naiveté and Cynicism in Negotiations and Other Competitive Contexts. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

18.

Bazerman, Max H., Francesca Gino, Lisa L. Shu, & Chia‐Jung Tsay. (2011). Joint Evaluation as a Real-World Tool for Managing Emotional Assessments of Morality. Emotion Review. 3(3). 290–292. 32 indexed citations

19.

Tsay, Chia‐Jung & Max H. Bazerman. (2009). A Decision-Making Perspective to Negotiation: A Review of the Past and a Look into the Future. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

20.

Milkman, Katherine L., et al.. (2009). Policy Bundling to Overcome Loss Aversion: A Method for Improving Legislative Outcomes. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact