Kim Frumin

488 total citations
8 papers, 287 citations indexed

About

Kim Frumin is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Frumin has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 287 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 4 papers in Information Systems and Management and 4 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Kim Frumin's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (4 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers). Kim Frumin is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (4 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers). Kim Frumin collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Kim Frumin's co-authors include Chris Dede, Arthur Eisenkraft, Abigail Jurist Levy, Frances Lawrenz, Christian Fischer, Barry Fishman, Maxwell M. Yurkofsky, Jal Mehta, Amy M. Kamarainen and Jason Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, International Journal of Science Education and Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

In The Last Decade

Kim Frumin

8 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim Frumin United States 7 215 58 41 29 28 8 287
Katie Pak United States 6 289 1.3× 84 1.4× 53 1.3× 28 1.0× 19 0.7× 12 355
Sam Redding United States 10 257 1.2× 48 0.8× 30 0.7× 25 0.9× 12 0.4× 39 346
Jana Hunzicker United States 7 329 1.5× 58 1.0× 24 0.6× 35 1.2× 18 0.6× 21 379
Kristin Shawn Huggins United States 11 315 1.5× 50 0.9× 75 1.8× 40 1.4× 17 0.6× 24 371
Nancy Protheroe 9 238 1.1× 48 0.8× 47 1.1× 15 0.5× 12 0.4× 49 309
Brian Noonan Canada 12 276 1.3× 49 0.8× 39 1.0× 24 0.8× 9 0.3× 22 339
Rebecca DuFour 6 448 2.1× 129 2.2× 70 1.7× 36 1.2× 19 0.7× 10 543
Philippa Cordingley United Kingdom 8 348 1.6× 110 1.9× 92 2.2× 42 1.4× 13 0.5× 12 443
William A. Sommers 5 325 1.5× 66 1.1× 31 0.8× 25 0.9× 12 0.4× 9 381
Amy Bernstein Colton United States 7 383 1.8× 67 1.2× 20 0.5× 43 1.5× 12 0.4× 11 433

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Frumin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Frumin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Frumin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Frumin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Frumin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Frumin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Frumin. The network helps show where Kim Frumin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Frumin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Frumin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Frumin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Frumin. Kim Frumin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Fischer, Christian, Frances Lawrenz, Chris Dede, et al.. (2020). Identifying Levers Related to Student Performance on High-Stakes Science Exams: Examining School, Teaching, Teacher, and Professional Development Characteristics. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 122(2). 1–64. 13 indexed citations
2.
Yurkofsky, Maxwell M., et al.. (2020). Research on Continuous Improvement: Exploring the Complexities of Managing Educational Change. Review of Research in Education. 44(1). 403–433. 76 indexed citations
3.
Levy, Abigail Jurist, Kim Frumin, Frances Lawrenz, et al.. (2019). From the Inside Out: Teacher Responses to the AP Curriculum Redesign. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 31(2). 208–225. 3 indexed citations
4.
Frumin, Kim, Chris Dede, Christian Fischer, et al.. (2018). Adapting to large-scale changes in Advanced Placement Biology, Chemistry, and Physics: the impact of online teacher communities. International Journal of Science Education. 40(4). 397–420. 22 indexed citations
5.
Fischer, Christian, Barry Fishman, Chris Dede, et al.. (2018). Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform. Teaching and Teacher Education. 72. 107–121. 114 indexed citations
6.
Dede, Chris, et al.. (2016). Teacher Learning in the Digital Age: Online Professional Development in STEM Education.. 38 indexed citations
7.
Fischer, Christian, Barry Fishman, Abigail Jurist Levy, et al.. (2016). When Do Students in Low-SES Schools Perform Better-Than-Expected on a High-Stakes Test? Analyzing School, Teacher, Teaching, and Professional Development Characteristics. Urban Education. 55(8-9). 1280–1314. 13 indexed citations
8.
Metcalf, Shari, Jason Chen, Amy M. Kamarainen, et al.. (2014). Shifts in Student Motivation during Usage of a Multi-User Virtual Environment for Ecosystem Science. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 5(4). 1–16. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026