Kate A. Ratliff
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer L. HowellLiz RedfordBrian A. NosekColin Tucker SmithShigehiro OishiEyal PeerGabriele PaolacciJesse Chandler
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (38 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological ScienceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Kate A. Ratliff
53 papers receiving 922 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Sociology and Political Science 588
- Social Psychology 331
- Gender Studies 183
- Cognitive Neuroscience 135
- Applied Psychology 129
Countries citing papers authored by Kate A. Ratliff
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate A. Ratliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate A. Ratliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate A. Ratliff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate A. Ratliff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate A. Ratliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate A. Ratliff. The network helps show where Kate A. Ratliff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate A. Ratliff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate A. Ratliff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate A. Ratliff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate A. Ratliff. Kate A. Ratliff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | Non-Naïve Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes | 2 |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | PsychDisclosure.Org: Grassroot Support for Reforming Reporting Standards in Psychology | 13 |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 77 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Kate A. Ratliff
Kate A. Ratliff is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Gender Studies, having authored 55 papers that have together received 953 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (38 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (129 citations), Gender Studies (183 citations) and Social Psychology (331 citations). Kate A. Ratliff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Howell, Liz Redford, Brian A. Nosek, Colin Tucker Smith, Shigehiro Oishi, Eyal Peer, Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Pam Mueller and Jacqueline M. Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.