Colin Tucker Smith

3.3k citations
48 papers · 1.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 19

Colin Tucker Smith

47 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and st...7872007202620132019250500750

Peers

Colin Tucker Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Applied Psychology 297
  • Social Psychology 783
  • Gender Studies 307
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 378
Replace T. Andrew Poehlman with:
T. Andrew Poehlman United States
Alison P. Lenton United Kingdom
Stacey Sinclair United States
Fredrik Björklund Sweden
Carolyn L. Hafer Canada
Joni R. Jackson United States
Michael A. Zárate United States
Sarah S. M. Townsend United States
Ernestine Gordijn Netherlands
Stanley L. Brodsky United States
Colin Tucker Smith relative to T. Andrew Poehlman United States T. Andrew Poehlman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
T. Andrew Poehlman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Tucker Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Tucker Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Tucker Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Tucker Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Tucker Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Tucker Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Tucker Smith. The network helps show where Colin Tucker Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colin Tucker Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Tucker Smith Line = papers co-authored together Colin Tucker Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20252
3 20250
4 20242
5 20238
6 20223
7 20205
8 202016
9 201912
10 20188
11 20185
12 201713
13 201625
14 201537
15 201513
16 201518
17 201412
18
PsychDisclosure.Org: Grassroot Support for Reforming Reporting Standards in Psychology
201313
19 201218
20 2007155

About Colin Tucker Smith

Colin Tucker Smith is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (36 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (22 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (297 citations), Social Psychology (783 citations) and Gender Studies (307 citations). Colin Tucker Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brian A. Nosek, Kate Ranganath, Jan De Houwer, Anthony G. Greenwald, Frederick L. Smyth, Nicole M. Lindner, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Thierry Devos, Kristina R. Olson and Dolly Chugh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026