Colin Tucker Smith
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 11
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Cultural Differences and Values 22
- Gender Studies top 2%
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 36
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research 4
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 3
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 12
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 3
- Co-authors
- Brian A. NosekKate RanganathJan De HouwerAnthony G. GreenwaldFrederick L. SmythNicole M. LindnerMahzarin R. BanajiThierry Devos
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (3 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumGermany
In The Last Decade
Colin Tucker Smith
47 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Applied Psychology 297
- Social Psychology 783
- Gender Studies 307
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 378
Countries citing papers authored by Colin Tucker Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Tucker Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Tucker Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Tucker Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Tucker Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Tucker Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Tucker Smith. The network helps show where Colin Tucker Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colin Tucker Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 18 | PsychDisclosure.Org: Grassroot Support for Reforming Reporting Standards in Psychology | 2013 | 13 |
| 19 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 155 |
About Colin Tucker Smith
Colin Tucker Smith is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (36 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (22 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (297 citations), Social Psychology (783 citations) and Gender Studies (307 citations). Colin Tucker Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brian A. Nosek, Kate Ranganath, Jan De Houwer, Anthony G. Greenwald, Frederick L. Smyth, Nicole M. Lindner, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Thierry Devos, Kristina R. Olson and Dolly Chugh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.