Stephanie A. Goodwin

1.7k citations
16 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 12

Stephanie A. Goodwin

15 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephanie A. Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 773
  • Social Psychology 521
  • Gender Studies 355
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 150
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 110
Replace Justin Friesen with:
Justin Friesen Canada
Orsolya Hunyady United States
Hilary B. Bergsieker United States
Kimberly Fairchild United States
Rob Foels United States
Susanne Bruckmüller Germany
Jay W. Jackson United States
Gretchen B. Sechrist United States
Ludwin E. Molina United States
Paul Hutchison United Kingdom
Stephanie A. Goodwin relative to Justin Friesen Canada Justin Friesen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Justin Friesen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie A. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie A. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie A. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie A. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie A. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie A. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie A. Goodwin. The network helps show where Stephanie A. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie A. Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie A. Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie A. Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie A. Goodwin. Stephanie A. Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 37
3 15
4 57
5
Warmth Trumps Competence in Evaluations of Both Ingroup and Outgroup.
7
6
Chronic Illness and the Academic Career.
5
7 94
8 167
9 297
10 14
11
Power and gender: The double-edged sword of ambivalence.
34
12
Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping by Default and by Design
1
13 277
14 14
15 97
16 22

About Stephanie A. Goodwin

Stephanie A. Goodwin is a scholar working on General Psychology, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (355 citations), Social Psychology (521 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (773 citations). Stephanie A. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Laurie A. Rudman, Susan T. Fiske, Leslie Ashburn‐Nardo, Kathryn Morris, Alexandra Gubin, Vincent Yzerbyt, Don Operario, Kipling D. Williams, Adrienne R. Carter‐Sowell and John C. Blanchar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026