Eyal Péer

30 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers

Eyal Péer
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • General Decision Sciences 89
  • Applied Psychology 122
  • Transportation 77
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 98
  • Information Systems 231
Replace Eloïse Coupey with:
Eloïse Coupey United States
James Dalziel Australia
Marilyn Giroux New Zealand
Hylton Boothroyd
Patricia A. Norberg United States
Markus Weinmann Liechtenstein
Arunesh Mathur United States
Kyle B. Murray Canada
Eeva Raita Finland
Yaxing Yao United States
Eyal Péer relative to Eloïse Coupey United States Eloïse Coupey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.7×
Eloïse Coupey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eyal Péer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eyal Péer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eyal Péer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eyal Péer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eyal Péer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eyal Péer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eyal Péer. The network helps show where Eyal Péer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Eyal Péer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eyal Péer Line = papers co-authored together Eyal Péer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015155
2 202078
3 201567
4 201645
5 201144
6 201039
7 201539
8 201036
9 201531
10 201423
11 201021
12 200621
13 201219
14 201918
15 201316
16 201215
17 201913
18 201212
19 201911
20 20209

About Eyal Péer

Eyal Péer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Information Systems and Management and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (7 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (89 citations), Applied Psychology (122 citations), Transportation (77 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (98 citations) and Information Systems (231 citations). Eyal Péer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Serge Egelman, Eyal Gamliel, Marian Harbach, Alessandro Acquisti, Alisa Frik, Nathan Malkin, Arunesh Mathur, Sonam Samat, Laura Brandimarte and Maya Bar‐Hillel. Their work appears in journals such as Judgment and Decision Making, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and Practical assessment, research & evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact