Rob Foels

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
21 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Rob Foels is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rob Foels has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Education and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Rob Foels's work include Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers). Rob Foels is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers). Rob Foels collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Rob Foels's co-authors include Andrew L. Stewart, Felicia Pratto, Arnold K. Ho, Kristin E. Henkel, Jennifer Sheehy‐Skeffington, Nour Kteily, Jim Sidanius, Thomas J. Tomcho, Brian Mullen and James E. Driskell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Sex Roles and Basic and Applied Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Rob Foels

21 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing an... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rob Foels United States 12 705 475 173 150 119 21 1.1k
Jay W. Jackson United States 14 851 1.2× 539 1.1× 159 0.9× 73 0.5× 112 0.9× 28 1.2k
Orsolya Hunyady United States 3 1.0k 1.5× 694 1.5× 203 1.2× 192 1.3× 79 0.7× 5 1.3k
Jorge Vala Portugal 19 963 1.4× 547 1.2× 176 1.0× 240 1.6× 96 0.8× 83 1.3k
Hilary B. Bergsieker United States 14 872 1.2× 583 1.2× 182 1.1× 116 0.8× 71 0.6× 23 1.2k
Margaret Foddy Australia 18 877 1.2× 445 0.9× 143 0.8× 124 0.8× 75 0.6× 32 1.4k
Paul Hutchison United Kingdom 17 670 1.0× 399 0.8× 233 1.3× 90 0.6× 253 2.1× 24 1.3k
Kathryn C. Oleson United States 12 707 1.0× 556 1.2× 138 0.8× 179 1.2× 73 0.6× 25 1.2k
Toon Kuppens Netherlands 20 718 1.0× 401 0.8× 127 0.7× 114 0.8× 91 0.8× 51 1.2k
Andrew L. Stewart United States 11 799 1.1× 495 1.0× 240 1.4× 144 1.0× 60 0.5× 21 1.1k
Scott Eidelman United States 19 734 1.0× 516 1.1× 121 0.7× 234 1.6× 43 0.4× 35 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Foels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Foels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Foels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Foels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Foels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Foels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Foels. The network helps show where Rob Foels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Foels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Foels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Foels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Foels. Rob Foels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tomcho, Thomas J., et al.. (2021). Content of measurement courses in the undergraduate psychology curriculum.. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 10(3). 291–295. 1 indexed citations
2.
Tomcho, Thomas J., et al.. (2018). Psychology of religion courses in the undergraduate curriculum.. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. 12(2). 241–246. 3 indexed citations
3.
Tomcho, Thomas J. & Rob Foels. (2017). Psychological Literacy in Applied Psychology Disciplines. Teaching of Psychology. 44(2). 108–116. 5 indexed citations
4.
Ho, Arnold K., Jim Sidanius, Nour Kteily, et al.. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 109(6). 1003–1028. 702 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Stewart, Andrew L., Felicia Pratto, Fouad Bou Zeineddine, et al.. (2015). International support for the Arab uprisings: Understanding sympathetic collective action using theories of social dominance and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 19(1). 6–26. 35 indexed citations
6.
Tomcho, Thomas J., et al.. (2014). Outside the Classroom and Beyond Psychology. Teaching of Psychology. 42(1). 5–13. 6 indexed citations
7.
Tomcho, Thomas J. & Rob Foels. (2012). Meta-Analysis of Group Learning Activities: Empirically Based Teaching Recommendations. Teaching of Psychology. 39(3). 159–169. 51 indexed citations
8.
Reid, Landon D. & Rob Foels. (2010). Cognitive Complexity and the Perception of Subtle Racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 32(4). 291–301. 21 indexed citations
9.
Foels, Rob & Landon D. Reid. (2010). Gender Differences in Social Dominance Orientation: The Role of Cognitive Complexity. Sex Roles. 62(9-10). 684–692. 11 indexed citations
10.
Tomcho, Thomas J., et al.. (2009). APA's Learning Objectives for Research Methods and Statistics in Practice: A Multimethod Analysis. Teaching of Psychology. 36(2). 84–89. 6 indexed citations
11.
Tomcho, Thomas J. & Rob Foels. (2009). The Power of Teaching Activities: Statistical and Methodological Recommendations. Teaching of Psychology. 36(2). 96–101. 5 indexed citations
12.
Foels, Rob & Thomas J. Tomcho. (2009). Gender Differences in Interdependent Self-construals: It's Not the Type of Group, It's the Way You See It. Self and Identity. 8(4). 396–417. 18 indexed citations
13.
Tomcho, Thomas J. & Rob Foels. (2008). Assessing Effective Teaching of Psychology: A Meta-Analytic Integration of Learning Outcomes. Teaching of Psychology. 35(4). 286–296. 20 indexed citations
14.
Tomcho, Thomas J., et al.. (2008). Review of ToP Teaching Strategies: Links to Students' Scientific Inquiry Skills Development. Teaching of Psychology. 35(3). 147–159. 12 indexed citations
15.
Tomcho, Thomas J., et al.. (2006). Teaching about Psychological Disorders: Using a Group Interviewing ad Diagnostic Approach. Teaching of Psychology. 33(3). 184–188. 8 indexed citations
16.
Foels, Rob & Thomas J. Tomcho. (2005). Gender, Interdependent Self-construals, and Collective Self-esteem: Women and Men Are Mostly the Same. Self and Identity. 4(3). 213–225. 19 indexed citations
17.
Foels, Rob & Christopher J. Pappas. (2004). Learning and Unlearning the Myths We Are Taught: Gender and Social Dominance Orientation. Sex Roles. 50(11-12). 743–757. 39 indexed citations
18.
Mullen, Brian, et al.. (2002). Altering intergroup perceptions by altering prevailing mode of cognitive representation: "They look like people.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(6). 1333–1343. 15 indexed citations
19.
Mullen, Brian, et al.. (2002). Altering intergroup perceptions by altering prevailing mode of cognitive representation: "They look like people.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(6). 1333–1343. 16 indexed citations
20.
Foels, Rob, James E. Driskell, Brian Mullen, & Eduardo Salas. (2000). The Effects of Democratic Leadership on Group Member Satisfaction. Small Group Research. 31(6). 676–701. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026