Eyal Peer

6.7k total citations · 3 hit papers
26 papers, 4.6k citations indexed

About

Eyal Peer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eyal Peer has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eyal Peer's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers). Eyal Peer is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers). Eyal Peer collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Netherlands. Eyal Peer's co-authors include Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, Joachim Vosgerau, Ekaterina Damer, David Rothschild, Gordon Andrew, Idris Adjerid, Gabriele Paolacci and Jesse Chandler and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science and MIS Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Eyal Peer

26 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing ... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2017 2013 2021 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eyal Peer Israel 13 1.9k 983 669 641 513 26 4.6k
Joseph K. Goodman United States 16 1.4k 0.7× 894 0.9× 872 1.3× 491 0.8× 582 1.1× 33 4.7k
Laura Brandimarte United States 13 2.6k 1.4× 585 0.6× 584 0.9× 346 0.5× 359 0.7× 29 4.4k
Gabriele Paolacci Netherlands 15 2.9k 1.5× 1.4k 1.4× 866 1.3× 961 1.5× 824 1.6× 34 7.2k
Victoria Husted Medvec United States 27 1.7k 0.9× 1.3k 1.4× 325 0.5× 746 1.2× 982 1.9× 46 4.3k
Kai Sassenberg Germany 36 2.1k 1.1× 1.5k 1.5× 320 0.5× 552 0.9× 813 1.6× 176 3.9k
Leaf Van Boven United States 36 2.2k 1.1× 1.4k 1.4× 228 0.3× 835 1.3× 841 1.6× 109 5.2k
Jonathan Robinson United States 12 1.2k 0.6× 707 0.7× 484 0.7× 559 0.9× 342 0.7× 15 2.8k
Deborah A. Prentice United States 29 3.1k 1.6× 2.0k 2.0× 740 1.1× 660 1.0× 992 1.9× 48 6.5k
Edward B. Royzman United States 17 1.6k 0.8× 1.3k 1.4× 287 0.4× 1.3k 2.1× 363 0.7× 25 3.9k
Rosemary Pacini United States 10 1.1k 0.6× 1.2k 1.2× 541 0.8× 844 1.3× 711 1.4× 10 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Eyal Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eyal Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eyal Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eyal Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eyal Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eyal Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eyal Peer. The network helps show where Eyal Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eyal Peer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eyal Peer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eyal Peer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eyal Peer. Eyal Peer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peer, Eyal, Nina Mažar, Yuval Feldman, & Dan Ariely. (2024). How pledges reduce dishonesty: The role of involvement and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 113. 104614–104614. 1 indexed citations
2.
Peer, Eyal, Nina Mažar, Yuval Feldman, & Dan Ariely. (2023). Honesty Pledges: The Effects of Involvement and Identification Over Time. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Peer, Eyal, et al.. (2021). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods. 54(4). 1643–1662. 855 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Peer, Eyal & Yuval Feldman. (2021). Honesty pledges for the behaviorally-based regulation of dishonesty. Journal of European Public Policy. 28(5). 761–781. 15 indexed citations
5.
Peer, Eyal, et al.. (2020). Data Quality of Platforms and Panels for Behavioral Research. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
6.
Peer, Eyal & Yuval Feldman. (2020). Honesty Pledges for the Behaviorally-based Regulation of Dishonesty. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
7.
Peer, Eyal, et al.. (2018). Faculty attitudes about student evaluations and their relations to self-image as teacher. Social Psychology of Education. 21(3). 517–537. 14 indexed citations
8.
Peer, Eyal, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, & Alessandro Acquisti. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 70. 153–163. 1955 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Adjerid, Idris, Eyal Peer, & Alessandro Acquisti. (2016). Beyond the Privacy Paradox: Objective versus Relative Risk in Privacy Decision Making. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations
10.
Peer, Eyal & Alessandro Acquisti. (2016). The impact of reversibility on the decision to disclose personal information. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 33(6). 428–436. 10 indexed citations
11.
Peer, Eyal, Sonam Samat, Laura Brandimarte, & Alessandro Acquisti. (2015). Beyond the Turk: an Empirical Comparison of Alternative Platforms For Crowdsourcing Online Research. ACR North American Advances. 5 indexed citations
12.
Chandler, Jesse, Gabriele Paolacci, Eyal Peer, Pam Mueller, & Kate A. Ratliff. (2015). Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes. Psychological Science. 26(7). 1131–1139. 128 indexed citations
13.
Peer, Eyal, Alessandro Acquisti, & Shaul Shalvi. (2014). “I cheated, but only a little”: Partial confessions to unethical behavior.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 106(2). 202–217. 48 indexed citations
14.
Peer, Eyal, Joachim Vosgerau, & Alessandro Acquisti. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
15.
Peer, Eyal. (2014). Pay More Save Less: The Paradoxical Time-Saving Bias in Consumerss Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
16.
Peer, Eyal, Joachim Vosgerau, & Alessandro Acquisti. (2013). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods. 46(4). 1023–1031. 1269 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Peer, Eyal & Elisha Babad. (2013). The Doctor Fox research (1973) rerevisited: “Educational seduction” ruled out.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 106(1). 36–45. 14 indexed citations
18.
Peer, Eyal, Alessandro Acquisti, & Shaul Shalvi. (2013). 'I Cheated, But Only a Little' – Partial Confessions to Unethical Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
19.
Peer, Eyal, Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, & Pam Mueller. (2012). Screening Participants from Previous Studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk and Qualtrics. SSRN Electronic Journal. 50 indexed citations
20.
Babad, Elisha, Eyal Peer, & Renée Hobbs. (2012). Media literacy and media bias: Are media literacy students less susceptible to nonverbal judgment biases?. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 1(2). 97–107. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026