Karen Mattock

33 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Karen Mattock
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 680
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 632
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 361
  • Social Psychology 89
  • Artificial Intelligence 73
Replace Erica B. Stevens with:
Erica B. Stevens United States
Christine L. Stager Canada
Renée N. Desjardins Canada
Adrián García‐Sierra United States
E I Stolyarova United States
Ulla Sundberg Sweden
Reiko Mazuka Japan
Huei‐Mei Liu United States
Jean E. Andruski United States
Julia Irwin United States
Karen Mattock relative to Erica B. Stevens United States Erica B. Stevens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Erica B. Stevens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Mattock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Mattock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Mattock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Mattock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Mattock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Mattock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Mattock. The network helps show where Karen Mattock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Mattock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Mattock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Mattock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Mattock. Karen Mattock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 3
4 5
5 2
6 26
7 11
8 16
9 23
10
Preverbal infants are sensitive to cross-sensory correspondences : much ado about the null results of Lewkowicz and Minar (2013)
2
11 74
12 35
13 31
14
Cross-situational language learning: The effects of grammatical categories as constraints on referential labeling
6
15 86
16 2
17 136
18 164
19
Delay? No way! Bilingual infants are more efficient word learners
2
20
Perceptual reorganisation for tone : linguistic tone and non-linguistic pitch perception by English language and Chinese language infants
4

About Karen Mattock

Karen Mattock is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Developmental Biology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (21 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (680 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (632 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (361 citations). Karen Mattock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Denis Burnham, Padraic Monaghan, Linda Polka, Peter Walker, Marina Kalashnikova, Susan Rvachew, Scott P. Johnson, Jo Spring, Alan Slater and Monika Molnar. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026