Jo Spring

465 total citations
10 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Jo Spring is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Automotive Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Spring has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 6 papers in Automotive Engineering and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Jo Spring's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). Jo Spring is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). Jo Spring collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Jo Spring's co-authors include Scott P. Johnson, J. Gavin Bremner, Alan Slater, Uschi Mason, Peter Walker, Karen Mattock, Rachel Hayes, D. Gaskell and Caroline Murphy and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Psychological Science and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jo Spring

9 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jo Spring United Kingdom	7	240	139	73	69	45	10	304
Sarah Dolscheid Germany	10	310 1.3×	133 1.0×	81 1.1×	75 1.1×	28 0.6×	24	393
Uschi Mason United Kingdom	7	241 1.0×	215 1.5×	153 2.1×	80 1.2×	40 0.9×	10	409
Pascale Lidji Canada	8	209 0.9×	309 2.2×	49 0.7×	65 0.9×	8 0.2×	16	368
Kristine A. Kovack‐Lesh United States	9	132 0.6×	88 0.6×	271 3.7×	40 0.6×	11 0.2×	11	325
Dominique T. Vuvan Canada	13	197 0.8×	543 3.9×	60 0.8×	94 1.4×	10 0.2×	29	588
Aaron D. Mitchel United States	10	217 0.9×	207 1.5×	209 2.9×	34 0.5×	13 0.3×	18	423
Eve Dupierrix France	9	89 0.4×	221 1.6×	52 0.7×	31 0.4×	12 0.3×	17	295
Satsuki Nakai United Kingdom	8	279 1.2×	100 0.7×	301 4.1×	31 0.4×	13 0.3×	18	501
Kristen Tummeltshammer United States	8	50 0.2×	147 1.1×	192 2.6×	50 0.7×	10 0.2×	10	297
Özge Öztürk United States	7	232 1.0×	88 0.6×	96 1.3×	57 0.8×	8 0.2×	11	305

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Spring

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Spring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Spring

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Spring. The network helps show where Jo Spring may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Spring

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Spring. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Spring based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Spring. Jo Spring is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2021). Eye tracking provides no evidence that young infants understand path obstruction. Infant Behavior and Development. 65. 101659–101659.

Bremner, J. Gavin, Alan Slater, Rachel Hayes, et al.. (2017). Young infants’ visual fixation patterns in addition and subtraction tasks support an object tracking account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 162. 199–208. 7 indexed citations

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2016). Perception of occlusion by young infants: Must the occlusion event be congruent with the occluder?. Infant Behavior and Development. 44. 240–248. 2 indexed citations

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2016). Limits of Object Persistence: Young Infants Perceive Continuity of Vertical and Horizontal Trajectories, But Not 45‐Degree Oblique Trajectories. Infancy. 22(3). 303–322. 4 indexed citations

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2012). The Effects of Auditory Information on 4-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Trajectory Continuity. Child Development. 83(3). 954–964. 11 indexed citations

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2012). Trajectory perception and object continuity: Effects of shape and color change on 4-month-olds' perception of object identity.. Developmental Psychology. 49(6). 1021–1026. 13 indexed citations

Johnson, Scott P., et al.. (2012). Young infants’ perception of the trajectories of two- and three-dimensional objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 113(1). 177–185. 7 indexed citations

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2011). Illusory contour figures are perceived as occluding contours by 4-month-old infants.. Developmental Psychology. 48(2). 398–405. 12 indexed citations

Bremner, J. Gavin, et al.. (2011). Two- to Eight-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Dynamic Auditory–Visual Spatial Colocation. Child Development. 82(4). 1210–1223. 10 indexed citations

10.

Walker, Peter, J. Gavin Bremner, Uschi Mason, et al.. (2009). Preverbal Infants’ Sensitivity to Synaesthetic Cross-Modality Correspondences. Psychological Science. 21(1). 21–25. 238 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact