Peter Walker

2.7k total citations
70 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Peter Walker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Walker has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 38 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 19 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Walker's work include Multisensory perception and integration (29 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers) and Color perception and design (12 papers). Peter Walker is often cited by papers focused on Multisensory perception and integration (29 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers) and Color perception and design (12 papers). Peter Walker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Peter Walker's co-authors include Graham J. Hitch, Charlie Lewis, Sylvia B. Smith, Laura Walker, Brian Francis, Karen Mattock, J. Gavin Bremner, Scott P. Johnson, Jo Spring and Alan Slater and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Psychological Bulletin and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Peter Walker

67 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Walker United Kingdom 23 1.0k 1.0k 480 474 267 70 2.0k
Giovanni Galfano Italy 27 1.9k 1.8× 733 0.7× 410 0.9× 275 0.6× 308 1.2× 71 2.3k
Ruth Kimchi Israel 29 2.5k 2.4× 819 0.8× 650 1.4× 414 0.9× 168 0.6× 85 3.3k
Jelena Ristic Canada 23 2.1k 2.0× 550 0.5× 458 1.0× 354 0.7× 134 0.5× 68 2.4k
Florian Hutzler Austria 30 2.3k 2.2× 571 0.6× 263 0.5× 1.6k 3.3× 463 1.7× 74 2.9k
J. Gavin Bremner United Kingdom 23 789 0.8× 569 0.6× 311 0.6× 949 2.0× 239 0.9× 74 1.8k
Daniël Schreij Netherlands 8 1.5k 1.5× 666 0.7× 375 0.8× 369 0.8× 85 0.3× 15 2.2k
Eloisa Valenza Italy 20 1.5k 1.4× 643 0.6× 305 0.6× 652 1.4× 108 0.4× 47 1.9k
Grégoire Borst France 29 1.1k 1.1× 677 0.7× 259 0.5× 653 1.4× 426 1.6× 120 2.1k
Denis Mareschal United Kingdom 35 1.7k 1.6× 920 0.9× 645 1.3× 1.9k 4.1× 328 1.2× 151 3.6k
Jefferson Provost United States 6 2.0k 1.9× 929 0.9× 333 0.7× 986 2.1× 112 0.4× 7 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Walker. The network helps show where Peter Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Walker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Walker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Walker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Walker. Peter Walker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hayes, Lawrence D., et al.. (2023). Perception of Size and Mass Relationships of Moving and Stationary Object in Collision Events in 10-to-11-Month-Old Infants. Behavioral Sciences. 13(1). 56–56. 1 indexed citations
2.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2018). Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolize the felt heaviness of objects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 45(2). 246–252. 7 indexed citations
3.
Walker, Peter, J. Gavin Bremner, Marco Lunghi, et al.. (2018). Newborns are sensitive to the correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation. Developmental Psychobiology. 60(2). 216–223. 21 indexed citations
4.
Walker, Peter. (2016). Cross-sensory correspondences and symbolism in spoken and written language.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(9). 1339–1361. 13 indexed citations
5.
Walker, Laura & Peter Walker. (2015). Cross-sensory mapping of feature values in the size–brightness correspondence can be more relative than absolute.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 42(1). 138–150. 34 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Peter, J. Gavin Bremner, Uschi Mason, et al.. (2014). Preverbal infants are sensitive to cross-sensory correspondences : much ado about the null results of Lewkowicz and Minar (2013). Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 2 indexed citations
7.
Monaghan, Padraic, Karen Mattock, & Peter Walker. (2012). The role of sound symbolism in language learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(5). 1152–1164. 74 indexed citations
8.
Walker, Peter & Laura Walker. (2012). Size–brightness correspondence: Crosstalk and congruity among dimensions of connotative meaning. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 74(6). 1226–1240. 41 indexed citations
9.
Walker, Peter, Helen Kennedy, & Damon Berridge. (2011). Object naming induces reliance on orientation-independent representations during longer-term, but not short-term, visual remembering. Memory. 19(8). 809–824. 1 indexed citations
10.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2007). The state of humanitarian funding. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations
11.
Walker, Peter & Simon Davies. (2003). Perceptual completion and object-based representations in short-term visual memory. Memory & Cognition. 31(5). 746–760. 9 indexed citations
12.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2003). Autism and a deficit in broadening the spread of visual attention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 44(2). 274–284. 90 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Peter, Graham J. Hitch, Stephen A. Dewhurst, H. Whiteley, & Maria A. Brandimonte. (1997). The representation of nonstructural information in visual memory: Evidence from image combination. Memory & Cognition. 25(4). 484–491. 16 indexed citations
15.
Hitch, Graham J., Maria A. Brandimonte, & Peter Walker. (1995). Two types of representation in visual memory: Evidence from the effects of stimulus contrast on image combination. Memory & Cognition. 23(2). 147–154. 46 indexed citations
16.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (1994). The enhanced representation of surface texture consequent on the loss of sight. Neuropsychologia. 32(3). 289–297. 4 indexed citations
17.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (1993). The effect of visual similarity on short-term memory for spatial location: Implications for the capacity of visual short-term memory. Acta Psychologica. 83(3). 203–224. 49 indexed citations
18.
Whiteley, H. & Peter Walker. (1991). The role of articulation in the parsing and retention of letter strings in tachistoscopic free recall.. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie. 45(1). 75–82. 3 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, Charlie & Peter Walker. (1989). Typographic influences on reading. British Journal of Psychology. 80(2). 241–257. 64 indexed citations
20.
Walker, Peter & Sylvia B. Smith. (1984). Stroop Interference Based on the Synaesthetic Qualities of Auditory Pitch. Perception. 13(1). 75–81. 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026