Jonathan Hook

57 papers receiving 777 citations

Peers

Jonathan Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Human-Computer Interaction 460
  • Occupational Therapy 52
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 233
  • Museology 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 178
Replace Jean-Bernard Martens with:
Jean-Bernard Martens Netherlands
Margherita Antona Greece
Hayes Raffle United States
Kees Overbeeke Netherlands
Miriam Sturdee United Kingdom
Stéphane Conversy France
Rafael Ballagas United States
Katherine Everitt United States
Marion Koelle Germany
Alessandro Soro Australia
Jonathan Hook relative to Jean-Bernard Martens Netherlands Jean-Bernard Martens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jean-Bernard Martens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Hook. The network helps show where Jonathan Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Hook Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201089
2 201467
3 201864
4 201752
5
Multi-Touch Surfaces: A Technical Guide
200841
6 202037
7 201131
8 201627
9 200927
10 201726
11 201524
12 201424
13 201419
14 201518
15 200817
16 202016
17 201216
18 201815
19 201315
20 201314

About Jonathan Hook

Jonathan Hook is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Museology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Architecture and Conservation, having authored 61 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (21 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (19 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (13 papers), Digital Games and Media (11 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (7 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (6 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (460 citations), Occupational Therapy (52 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (233 citations), Museology (37 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (178 citations). Jonathan Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Olivier, Peter Wright, Abigail Durrant, John McCarthy, Paul Dunphy, David W. Kim, James Nicholson, Pam Briggs, John William Nicholson and Guy Schofield. Their work appears in journals such as Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage and The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026