Jill C. Bradley‐Geist
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Julie B. Olson‐BuchananJohn MillimanSeth A. KaplanAfra AhmadAlex LindseyAmanda J. AndersonRonald S. LandisEden B. King
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jill C. Bradley‐Geist
17 papers receiving 454 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Social Psychology 155
- Clinical Psychology 142
- Sociology and Political Science 139
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 115
- Education 74
Countries citing papers authored by Jill C. Bradley‐Geist
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill C. Bradley‐Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill C. Bradley‐Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill C. Bradley‐Geist more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jill C. Bradley‐Geist
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill C. Bradley‐Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill C. Bradley‐Geist. The network helps show where Jill C. Bradley‐Geist may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill C. Bradley‐Geist
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill C. Bradley‐Geist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill C. Bradley‐Geist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill C. Bradley‐Geist. Jill C. Bradley‐Geist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 70 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 140 | |
| 14 | 89 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 46 |
About Jill C. Bradley‐Geist
Jill C. Bradley‐Geist is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (115 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations) and Social Psychology (155 citations). Jill C. Bradley‐Geist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Julie B. Olson‐Buchanan, John Milliman, Seth A. Kaplan, Afra Ahmad, Alex Lindsey, Amanda J. Anderson, Ronald S. Landis, Eden B. King, Michelle R. Hebl and Jeanine Skorinko. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Business Ethics and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.