Ingo Angermeier

1.1k citations
10 papers · 892 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ingo Angermeier

9 papers receiving 832 citations

Peers

Ingo Angermeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 331
  • Strategy and Management 316
  • Marketing 188
  • Information Systems and Management 128
  • Information Systems 262
Replace Tina M. Loraas with:
Tina M. Loraas United States
Young Eun Lee South Korea
Taylan Budur Iraq
Dong‐Gil Ko United States
Jae Young Lee South Korea
Marian Carcary Ireland
Pradeep K. Tyagi United States
Ghulam Muhammad Kundi Pakistan
Abdul Halim Abdul Majid Malaysia
Hadi Al‐Abrrow Iraq
Ingo Angermeier relative to Tina M. Loraas United States Tina M. Loraas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Tina M. Loraas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Angermeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Angermeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Angermeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Angermeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Angermeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Angermeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Angermeier. The network helps show where Ingo Angermeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Angermeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Angermeier Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Angermeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2011362
2 2009303
3 2012120
4 201047
5 200927
6 200817
7 200414
8 20041
9
Financial plan charts a hospital's course for success.
19901
10
How reasonable is reasonable?
19790

About Ingo Angermeier

Ingo Angermeier is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 892 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (1 paper), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Access Control and Trust (1 paper), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper) and Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (331 citations), Strategy and Management (316 citations), Marketing (188 citations), Information Systems and Management (128 citations) and Information Systems (262 citations). Ingo Angermeier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Wayne Boss, Alan D. Boss, Benjamin B. Dunford, S. Duane Hansen, Laurie J. Kirsch, Scott R. Boss, Abbie J. Shipp, Robert H. Smith and Thomas A. Jennings. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Healthcare Management, European Journal of Information Systems, Journal of Health Organization and Management, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact