Hazel Conley

700 citations
30 papers · 379 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hazel Conley

28 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Hazel Conley
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Public Administration 188
  • Gender Studies 96
  • General Health Professions 150
  • Political Science and International Relations 112
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 44
Replace Sarah Oxenbridge with:
Sarah Oxenbridge Australia
Adam Mrozowicki Poland
Jay Wiggan United Kingdom
J. Rubery Bulgaria
Cécile Guillaume France
Trine Pernille Larsen Denmark
Susan Corby United Kingdom
Arjan Keizer United Kingdom
Boris Hirsch Germany
Michelle O’Sullivan Ireland
Hazel Conley relative to Sarah Oxenbridge Australia Sarah Oxenbridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Sarah Oxenbridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Conley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Conley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Conley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Conley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Conley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Conley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Conley. The network helps show where Hazel Conley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Conley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hazel Conley Line = papers co-authored together Hazel Conley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200463
2 200741
3 200230
4 201326
5 200322
6 201219
7 200616
8 201616
9 201815
10 201013
11 200513
12 201111
13 201811
14 200711
15 20119
16
Gender Equality in Public Services: Chasing the Dream
20148
17 20088
18 20168
19 20087
20
Inclusion: The DNA of leadership and change
20196

About Hazel Conley

Hazel Conley is a scholar working on Public Administration, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Law and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (11 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (3 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (188 citations), Gender Studies (96 citations), General Health Professions (150 citations), Political Science and International Relations (112 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (44 citations). Hazel Conley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Edmund Heery, Rick Delbridge, Paul Stewart, Tessa Wright, Sarah Jenkins, Marion Page, Paul Stewart, Sian Moore, Richard Bolden and Susan Durbin. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, Work Employment and Society, Industrial Law Journal, Economic and Industrial Democracy and Capital & Class.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026