Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Pearson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Pearson. The network helps show where Greg Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg Pearson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg Pearson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg Pearson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Greg Pearson. Greg Pearson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Garmire, E. & Greg Pearson. (2013). Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. Medical Entomology and Zoology.95 indexed citations
9.
Keller, Thomas E. & Greg Pearson. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Increasing Opportunities for Student Learning.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 71(5). 12–18.6 indexed citations
Pearson, Greg. (2004). Assessment of Technological Literacy: A National Academies Perspective.. The technology teacher. 63(7). 28.3 indexed citations
14.
Pearson, Greg. (2002). What Americans Know (or Think They Know) about Technology.. Issues in Science and Technology. 18(4). 80–82.2 indexed citations
15.
Pearson, Greg & Alison Young. (2002). Executive Summary. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need To Know More about Technology.. The technology teacher. 62(1). 8–12.6 indexed citations
16.
Pearson, Greg, et al.. (1998). The ecology of industry : sectors and linkages.13 indexed citations
17.
Oaks, Stanley C., et al.. (1991). COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY ON MALARIA PREVENTION AND CONTROL: STATUS REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES.2 indexed citations
18.
Oaks, Stanley C., et al.. (1991). Social and Behavioral Aspects of Malaria.1 indexed citations
19.
Oaks, Stanley C., et al.. (1991). Economics of Malaria Control.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.