Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Self-Trapping of Optical Beams
19641.6k citationsR. Y. Chiao, E. Garmire et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Theory of bistability in nonlinear distributed feedback structures
1979371 citationsHerbert G. Winful, John H. Marburger et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Garmire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Garmire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Garmire more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Garmire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Garmire. The network helps show where E. Garmire may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Garmire
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Garmire.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Garmire based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Garmire. E. Garmire is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Garmire, E.. (2012). The Solution Looking for a Problem.. Proceedings of the IEEE. 100. 2787–2793.1 indexed citations
Garmire, E.. (2003). The Engineering Design Method. The technology teacher. 62(4). 22–28.3 indexed citations
4.
Garmire, E., et al.. (1997). Optically controlling the active trap density in a semi-insulating MQW p-i-n device. Optics and Photonics News. 8. 50.1 indexed citations
5.
Mahgerefteh, Daniel, E. Garmire, Afshin Partovi, et al.. (1994). Picosecond response of a Cr-doped GaAs/ AIGaAs semi-insulating multiple-quantum-well photorefractive device.1 indexed citations
Goldstone, J. A. & E. Garmire. (1984). Macroscopic Manifestations of Microscopic Optical Bistability. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 1. 466.2 indexed citations
12.
Goldstone, J. A. & E. Garmire. (1984). Intrinsic polarization bistability in nonlinear media. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 313(1525). 395–399.4 indexed citations
Wilson, Keith E., et al.. (1981). Comparison of glass waveguide loss using different substrates (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 71. 1560.1 indexed citations
17.
Marburger, John H., Susan D. Allen, E. Garmire, M. D. Levenson, & Herbert G. Winful. (1978). Nonlinear behavior of a Fabry-Perot interferometer filled with a Kerr liquid (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 68. 642.2 indexed citations
18.
Allen, Susan D., E. Garmire, John H. Marburger, & Herbert G. Winful. (1978). Transient effects in bistable optical devices (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 68. 1360.1 indexed citations
19.
Garmire, E., et al.. (1976). Flexible, infrared transmissive waveguides at 10.6 μm (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 66. 1102.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.