Canadian Medical Association Journal
About
In The Last Decade
Canadian Medical Association Journal
6.0k papers receiving 161.5k citations
Fields of papers published in Canadian Medical Association Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian Medical Association Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Countries where authors publish in Canadian Medical Association Journal
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian Medical Association Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian Medical Association Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Medical Association Journal more than expected).
- A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people (2005)
- Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence (2006)
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care (2010)
- The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada (2004)
- Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (2005)
- A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)
- Common mental health problems in immigrants and refugees: general approach in primary care (2010)
- Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review (2010)
- Canadian guideline for Parkinson disease (2019)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.