Grace Goc Karp

45 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Grace Goc Karp
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 378
  • Sociology and Political Science 260
  • Social Psychology 223
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 186
  • Education 124
Replace Connie S. Collier with:
Connie S. Collier United States
Teresa Carlson Australia
Karen Lux Gaudreault United States
Claes Annerstedt Sweden
Patt Dodds United States
Ken Green United Kingdom
Chantal Amade-Escot France
Rebecca Duncombe United Kingdom
Linda L. Bain United States
Kirsten Petrie New Zealand
Grace Goc Karp relative to Connie S. Collier United States Connie S. Collier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Connie S. Collier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace Goc Karp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace Goc Karp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace Goc Karp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace Goc Karp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace Goc Karp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace Goc Karp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace Goc Karp. The network helps show where Grace Goc Karp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grace Goc Karp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grace Goc Karp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grace Goc Karp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grace Goc Karp. Grace Goc Karp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 2
3 1
4 5
5 2
6 24
7 47
8 3
9 90
10 1
11 4
12
Physical Educators' Technology Competencies and Usage
32
13 23
14
Using TARGET to enhance preservice classroom teachers' ability to identify and develop a motivational climate in physical education
5
15 0
16 14
17
Using the NASPE content standards - Part 1.
4
18 4
19 14
20
Why Do Some Students Who are Good at Physical Education Dislike It So Much
10

About Grace Goc Karp

Grace Goc Karp is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 46 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Education and Pedagogy (29 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (13 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (378 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (22 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (186 citations). Grace Goc Karp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Dana Perlman, Karen P. DePauw, Deborah Tannehill, Ann MacPhail, Helen Brown, Philip W. Scruggs, Steven H. Kelder, Mark Byra, Meilin Liu and Deborah L. Feltz. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Teaching and Teacher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026