Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Effects of Mental Practice on Motor Skill Learning and Performance: A Meta-analysis
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah L. Feltz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah L. Feltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah L. Feltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah L. Feltz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah L. Feltz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah L. Feltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah L. Feltz. The network helps show where Deborah L. Feltz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah L. Feltz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah L. Feltz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah L. Feltz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah L. Feltz. Deborah L. Feltz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
García, Félix Guillén, et al.. (2016). Necesidades motivacionales de los atletas respecto al burnout y el compromiso. Revista de Psicologia del Deporte. 25(1). 65–71.5 indexed citations
7.
Lirgg, Cathy, et al.. (2016). Self-Efficacy of Sports Officials: A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of sport behavior. 39(1). 39.16 indexed citations
Ede, Alison, et al.. (2011). Current directions in self-efficacy research in sport. Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte. 6(2). 181–201.15 indexed citations
14.
García, Félix Guillén, et al.. (2010). The refficacy scale: A premilinary investigation to develop a referee efficacy scale. 42(1). 104–104.1 indexed citations
Vargas‐Tonsing, Tiffanye M., et al.. (2003). The predictability of coaching efficacy on team efficacy and player efficacy in volleyball.. Journal of sport behavior. 26(4). 396–407.48 indexed citations
17.
Feltz, Deborah L., et al.. (2002). The Strength of Coaching Efficacy Between Certified and Noncertified Singapore Coaches. 14(1). 55–67.23 indexed citations
18.
Chase, Melissa A. & Deborah L. Feltz. (1999). Evaluación de la Autoeficacia en la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 9(1). 85–98.4 indexed citations
19.
George, Thomas R. & Deborah L. Feltz. (1995). Motivation in sport from a collective efficacy perspective.. International journal of sport psychology. 26(1). 98–116.34 indexed citations
20.
Krane, Vikki, Jill Hunter Williams, & Deborah L. Feltz. (1992). Path analysis examining relationships among cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, state confidence, performance expectations, and golf performance.. Journal of sport behavior. 15(4). 279–295.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.