Ginamarie Scott
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael D. MumfordLyle E. LeritzBlaine GaddisJill M. StrangeShane ConnellyRyan P. BrownEric Anthony DayLynn D. Devenport
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers)Design Education and Practice (4 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementStrategy and Management
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ginamarie Scott
12 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 764
- Social Psychology 495
- Strategy and Management 424
- Cognitive Neuroscience 316
Countries citing papers authored by Ginamarie Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Ginamarie Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ginamarie Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ginamarie Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ginamarie Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ginamarie Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ginamarie Scott. The network helps show where Ginamarie Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ginamarie Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ginamarie Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ginamarie Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ginamarie Scott. Ginamarie Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 125 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative reviewbreakdown → | 711 |
| 5 | 69 | |
| 6 | 97 | |
| 7 | 143 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | Evaluating Creative Ideas | 5 |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationshipsbreakdown → | 1161 |
About Ginamarie Scott
Ginamarie Scott is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers), Design Education and Practice (4 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (764 citations) and Strategy and Management (424 citations). Ginamarie Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Mumford, Lyle E. Leritz, Blaine Gaddis, Jill M. Strange, Shane Connelly, Ryan P. Brown, Eric Anthony Day, Lynn D. Devenport, Mary Shane Connelly and Samuel T. Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, The Leadership Quarterly and Creativity Research Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.