Accountability in Research

782 papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 782 papers published in Accountability in Research in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Accountability in Research usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (334 papers), Safety Research (244 papers) and General Health Professions (152 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (284 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (230 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accountability in Research are David B. Resnik, Adil E. Shamoo, Kevin C. Elliott, Michael Kalichman, L.M. Bouter, Debra J. Wilson, Tamarinde Haven, Barton Moffatt, Bor Luen Tang and Leonie van Grootel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Accountability in Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accountability in Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accountability in Research.

Countries where authors publish in Accountability in Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accountability in Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accountability in Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accountability in Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025