Gena R. Greher
- Education top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Music top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Jesse M. HeinesSuzanne L. BurtonS. Alex RuthmannAshleigh HillierSarah KuhnLinda SilkaFred MartinKaren Roehr
- Topics
- Music Technology and Sound Studies (9 papers)Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers)Music Education and Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gena R. Greher
19 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Education 117
- Computer Science Applications 98
- Music 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 77
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Gena R. Greher
This map shows the geographic impact of Gena R. Greher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gena R. Greher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gena R. Greher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gena R. Greher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gena R. Greher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gena R. Greher. The network helps show where Gena R. Greher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gena R. Greher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gena R. Greher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gena R. Greher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gena R. Greher. Gena R. Greher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virtual piano instruction for the college learner | 1 |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | Computational Thinking in Sound: Teaching the Art and Science of Music and Technology | 8 |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | Real-world projects for developing musical and computational thinking | 1 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | SoundScape: An Interdisciplinary Music Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults on the Autism Spectrum. | 3 |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Gena R. Greher
Gena R. Greher is a scholar working on Music, Architecture and Occupational Therapy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (9 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers) and Music Education and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (84 citations), Computer Science Applications (98 citations) and Architecture (8 citations). Gena R. Greher has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jesse M. Heines, Suzanne L. Burton, S. Alex Ruthmann, Ashleigh Hillier, Sarah Kuhn, Linda Silka, Fred Martin, Karen Roehr, Holly A. Yanco and Dominique Haughton. Their work appears in journals such as Computer, Psychology of Music and Music Education Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.