Psychology of Music

1.5k papers and 30.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Psychology of Music in the last decades have received a total of 30.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology of Music usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k papers), Music (902 papers) and Social Psychology (526 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Music Perception (1.1k papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (872 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (398 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology of Music are John Sloboda, Jane W. Davidson, Gary E. McPherson, Suvi Saarikallio, Patrik N. Juslin, David J. Hargreaves, Nikki S. Rickard, Adrian C. North, Tuomas Eerola and Emery Schubert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology of Music

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology of Music. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology of Music.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology of Music

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology of Music. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology of Music with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology of Music more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025