Emma C. Goodwin

33 total papers · 2.0k total citations
15 papers, 191 citations indexed

About

Emma C. Goodwin is a scholar working on Education, Safety Research and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma C. Goodwin has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 191 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Education, 7 papers in Safety Research and 3 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Emma C. Goodwin's work include Career Development and Diversity (6 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers). Emma C. Goodwin is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (6 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers). Emma C. Goodwin collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Emma C. Goodwin's co-authors include Erin E. Shortlidge, Jason E. Podrabsky, Paul J. Yong, Suzanne Estes, Jeffrey T. Olimpo, Shauna Anderson, Joseph P. Hughes, Nicola Spurrier, Anthea Magarey and Rebecca K. Golley and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Emma C. Goodwin

14 papers receiving 189 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma C. Goodwin 129 61 38 27 19 15 191
Sue Ellen DeChenne‐Peters 122 0.9× 82 1.3× 21 0.6× 30 1.1× 11 0.6× 9 174
Linnea Fletcher 84 0.7× 26 0.4× 29 0.8× 13 0.5× 25 1.3× 12 222
Joshua W. Reid 131 1.0× 26 0.4× 52 1.4× 16 0.6× 9 0.5× 21 183
Anita Patrick 108 0.8× 156 2.6× 27 0.7× 25 0.9× 23 1.2× 19 268
John Tillotson 144 1.1× 35 0.6× 56 1.5× 35 1.3× 13 0.7× 22 213
Jessica R. Chittum 178 1.4× 43 0.7× 51 1.3× 42 1.6× 8 0.4× 12 263
Blanca E. Rincón 190 1.5× 158 2.6× 12 0.3× 40 1.5× 12 0.6× 16 262
Diamanto Filippatou 168 1.3× 14 0.2× 61 1.6× 5 0.2× 10 0.5× 14 263
Thomas J. Tobin 140 1.1× 49 0.8× 30 0.8× 21 0.8× 6 0.3× 15 220
Hanna J. Arzi 214 1.7× 9 0.1× 105 2.8× 35 1.3× 8 0.4× 13 279

Countries citing papers authored by Emma C. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma C. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma C. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma C. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma C. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma C. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma C. Goodwin. The network helps show where Emma C. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma C. Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma C. Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma C. Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma C. Goodwin. Emma C. Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026