Effie Law

922 citations
19 papers · 427 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Effie Law

19 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Effie Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Human-Computer Interaction 153
  • Computer Science Applications 51
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 84
  • Information Systems and Management 43
  • Communication 36
Replace Chadia Abras with:
Chadia Abras United States
S. Howard Australia
Daniela Quiñones Chile
Elizabeth Furtado Brazil
Carol M. Barnum United States
Gianluca Schiavo Italy
Yu Shu Taiwan
Timothy Savage Ireland
William R. Hazlewood United States
Nassim JafariNaimi United States
Effie Law relative to Chadia Abras United States Chadia Abras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Chadia Abras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Effie Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Effie Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Effie Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Effie Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Effie Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Effie Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Effie Law. The network helps show where Effie Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Effie Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Effie Law Line = papers co-authored together Effie Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 202416
2 20234
3 20224
4 202110
5 20201
6 20204
7 201885
8 20184
9 20166
10 20159
11 201414
12 201421
13 20138
14 20116
15
Analysis of the Persuasiveness of User Experience Feedback on a Virtual Learning Environment.
20102
16 20091
17 20092
18 2008114
19
Social Software for Life-long Learning
2007116

About Effie Law

Effie Law is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Occupational Therapy, Health Information Management and Computer Science Applications, having authored 19 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), AI in Service Interactions (2 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (153 citations), Computer Science Applications (51 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (84 citations), Information Systems and Management (43 citations) and Communication (36 citations). Effie Law has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Florian Brühlmann, Elisa D. Mekler, Virpi Roto, Arnold Vermeeren, Joke Kort, Marc Hassenzahl, Miloš Kravčík, Ralf Klamma, Hans Hummel and Ebba Þóra Hvannberg. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Technology & Society, Electronic Markets, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, Interacting with Computers and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026