Replace ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction with:
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionUnited States
Personal and Ubiquitous ComputingUnited States
Journal of Computer Assisted LearningUnited Kingdom
Design StudiesUnited Kingdom
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social NetworkingUnited States
Journal of Computer-Mediated CommunicationUnited States
Journal of Educational Computing ResearchUnited States
Educational Technology & SocietyTaiwan
Universal Access in the Information SocietyUnited Kingdom
Educational Research ReviewUnited States
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Interacting with Computers
Interacting with Computers · 1×
×1.721.5kHI
×0.97.8kSPS
×0.95.7kSP
×0.84.8kISM
×1.26.7kIS
Citations per year, relative to Interacting with Computers
Interacting with Computers · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Interacting with Computers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interacting with Computers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interacting with Computers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interacting with Computers more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Interacting with Computers
This network shows the impact of papers published in Interacting with Computers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interacting with Computers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.