Mark Springett

428 citations
23 papers · 243 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Springett

23 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Mark Springett
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Human-Computer Interaction 117
  • Information Systems and Management 40
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 13
  • Information Systems 65
  • Demography 34
Replace Rodolfo Inostroza with:
Rodolfo Inostroza Chile
Sandrine Balbo Australia
Leon Barnard United States
Debbie Stone United Kingdom
Lúcia Vilela Leite Filgueiras Brazil
Thomas Mahatody Madagascar
Jozsef A. Toth United States
Luís Rivero Brazil
Marilyn Hughes Blackmon United States
Pierre A. Akiki United Kingdom
Mark Springett relative to Rodolfo Inostroza Chile Rodolfo Inostroza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rodolfo Inostroza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Springett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Springett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Springett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Springett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Springett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Springett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Springett. The network helps show where Mark Springett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark Springett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Springett Line = papers co-authored together Mark Springett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199776
2 200030
3 201421
4 201716
5 200714
6 201713
7 200711
8 20198
9 20117
10
From user's problems to design errors: linking evaluation to improving design practice
19937
11 20096
12 19985
13 20164
14 20184
15 20214
16 20083
17 20213
18 20242
19 20132
20 20192

About Mark Springett

Mark Springett is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Occupational Therapy and Information Systems, having authored 23 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (4 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (3 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (2 papers) and Access Control and Trust (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (117 citations), Information Systems and Management (40 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (13 citations), Information Systems (65 citations) and Demography (34 citations). Mark Springett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, North Macedonia and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Sutcliffe, Martin Mihajlov, Michele B. Ryan, Juan Carlos Augusto, Effie Law, Andrés Muñoz, Tim French, Kecheng Liu, Effie Lai‐Chong Law and Richard Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as Future Generation Computer Systems, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Behaviour and Information Technology, Interacting with Computers and Applied Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact