David Lamas
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Health Informatics top 5%
Papers in
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 18
- Usability and User Interface Design 13
- Co-authors
- Sónia Sousa (28 shared papers)Fernando Loizides (5 shared papers)Ilkka Kosunen (1 shared paper)Marta Lárusdóttir (1 shared paper)Paulo Dias (4 shared papers)Jorge Oliveira (2 shared papers)António Moreira (1 shared paper)Marco Winckler (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2 papers)Computer (1 paper)Virtual Reality (1 paper)Applied Sciences (1 paper)Interacting with Computers (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- EstoniaUnited KingdomPortugal
In The Last Decade
David Lamas
80 papers receiving 601 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Human-Computer Interaction 125
- Health Informatics 21
- Social Psychology 191
- Safety Research 77
- Information Systems and Management 58
Countries citing papers authored by David Lamas
This map shows the geographic impact of David Lamas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lamas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lamas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Lamas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lamas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lamas. The network helps show where David Lamas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Lamas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 121 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 7 |
About David Lamas
David Lamas is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Social Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (18 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (13 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (10 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (8 papers), Design Education and Practice (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (125 citations), Health Informatics (21 citations), Social Psychology (191 citations), Safety Research (77 citations) and Information Systems and Management (58 citations). David Lamas has collaborated with scholars based in Estonia, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Sónia Sousa, Fernando Loizides, Ilkka Kosunen, Marta Lárusdóttir, Paulo Dias, Jorge Oliveira, António Moreira, Marco Winckler, Helen Petrie and Lennart E. Nacke. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Computer, Virtual Reality, Applied Sciences and Interacting with Computers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.