Dina Krasikova
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- James M. LeBretonStephen G. GreenPeter D. HarmsLei HuangDong LiuPaul B. LesterScott TonidandelFred Luthans
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dina Krasikova
13 papers receiving 785 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 434
- Social Psychology 361
- Clinical Psychology 233
- Sociology and Political Science 225
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
Countries citing papers authored by Dina Krasikova
This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Krasikova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Krasikova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Krasikova more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Krasikova
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Krasikova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Krasikova. The network helps show where Dina Krasikova may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina Krasikova
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina Krasikova. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina Krasikova based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina Krasikova. Dina Krasikova is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 77 | |
| 9 | 108 | |
| 10 | Destructive Leadershipbreakdown → | 351 |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | The Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness Program Evaluation. Report #4: Evaluation of Resilience Training and Mental and Behavioral Health Outcomes | 29 |
| 13 | 127 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Dina Krasikova
Dina Krasikova is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Occupational Therapy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (434 citations), Social Psychology (361 citations) and Applied Psychology (60 citations). Dina Krasikova has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James M. LeBreton, Stephen G. Green, Peter D. Harms, Lei Huang, Dong Liu, Paul B. Lester, Scott Tonidandel, Fred Luthans, Adam J. Vanhove and Mitchel N. Herian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management and Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.