Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Can resilience be developed at work? A meta‐analytic review of resilience‐building programme effectiveness
2015283 citationsAdam J. Vanhove, Mitchel N. Herian et al.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchel N. Herian
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchel N. Herian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchel N. Herian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchel N. Herian more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchel N. Herian
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchel N. Herian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchel N. Herian. The network helps show where Mitchel N. Herian may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchel N. Herian
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchel N. Herian.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchel N. Herian based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchel N. Herian. Mitchel N. Herian is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vanhove, Adam J. & Mitchel N. Herian. (2015). Resilience and Growth in Long-duration Isolated, Confined and Extreme (ICE) Missions A Literature Review and Selection, Training and Countermeasure Recommendations.9 indexed citations
3.
Vanhove, Adam J., Mitchel N. Herian, Alycia L. U. Perez, Peter D. Harms, & Paul B. Lester. (2015). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta‐analytic review of resilience‐building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 89(2). 278–307.283 indexed citations breakdown →
Hamm, Joseph A., Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Mitchel N. Herian, et al.. (2013). Deconstructing public confidence in state courts. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 3(1). 11–31.16 indexed citations
10.
Harms, Peter D., Mitchel N. Herian, Dina Krasikova, Adam J. Vanhove, & Paul B. Lester. (2013). The Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness Program Evaluation. Report #4: Evaluation of Resilience Training and Mental and Behavioral Health Outcomes. Insecta mundi.29 indexed citations
Rosenbaum, David I., et al.. (2012). Court date postcards: A benefit-cost analysis of using reminder cards to reduce failure to appear rates. 95(4). 177–187.6 indexed citations
Herian, Mitchel N. & Alan J. Tomkins. (2010). Citizen Satisfaction Survey Data. The American Review of Public Administration. 42(1). 66–86.14 indexed citations
19.
Herian, Mitchel N. & Brian H. Bornstein. (2010). Reducing Failure to Appear in Nebraska: A Field Study.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.