Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Luthans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Luthans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Luthans more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Luthans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Luthans. The network helps show where Fred Luthans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Luthans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Luthans.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Luthans based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Luthans. Fred Luthans is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Paterson, Ted A., Fred Luthans, & Wonho Jeung. (2013). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 35(3). 434–446.339 indexed citations breakdown →
Roche, Maree, Jarrod Haar, & Fred Luthans. (2012). Mindfulness, psychological capital, and well-being: A four study sample of organizational leaders. 13. 123–6.1 indexed citations
Jensen, Susan M. & Fred Luthans. (2006). Relationship between Entrepreneurs' Psychological Capital and Their Authentic Leadership. Journal of managerial issues. 18(2). 254.193 indexed citations
6.
Hodgetts, Richard M., Fred Luthans, & John W. Slocum. (1999). Strategy and HRM Initiatives for the '00s Environment: Redefining Roles and Boundaries, Linking Competencies and Resources. Organizational Dynamics. 2(28). 7–21.20 indexed citations
7.
May, Douglas R., et al.. (1998). New age technology and new aged workers: the impact of age on computer technology skill acquisition and the influence of computer self-efficacy, age-related beliefs, and change attitudes. Insecta mundi.2 indexed citations
Luthans, Fred, et al.. (1995). A Proposed Idiographic Approach to the Study of Entrepreneurs. Academy of Entrepreneurship journal. 1(1). 1.3 indexed citations
10.
Luthans, Fred, et al.. (1993). Meeting the New Paradigm Challenges through Total Quality Management. 34(1). 2.6 indexed citations
Luthans, Fred, et al.. (1992). The importance of social support for employee commitment: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of bank tellers.. Organization development journal.13 indexed citations
Wortman, Max S. & Fred Luthans. (1975). Emerging concepts in management : process, behavioral, quantitative, and systems. Macmillan eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Luthans, Fred & Richard M. Hodgetts. (1972). Social issues in business : poverty, civil rights, ecology, and consumerism.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.