Dina G. Okamoto
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kim EbertG. Cristina MoraPaula EnglandElisabeth S. ClemensWalter W. PowellHugh MehanIrene VillanuevaAngela Lintz
- Topics
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration (14 papers)Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (10 papers)Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (9 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Sociological ReviewAmerican Journal of Sociology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Dina G. Okamoto
39 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
- Education 347
- Political Science and International Relations 237
- Gender Studies 169
- Demography 157
Countries citing papers authored by Dina G. Okamoto
This map shows the geographic impact of Dina G. Okamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina G. Okamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina G. Okamoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dina G. Okamoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina G. Okamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina G. Okamoto. The network helps show where Dina G. Okamoto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina G. Okamoto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina G. Okamoto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina G. Okamoto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina G. Okamoto. Dina G. Okamoto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | The secondary transfer effect of inter-racial contact on whites and blacks’ receptivity toward immigrants in the United States | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 70 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Dina G. Okamoto
Dina G. Okamoto is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (14 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (10 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (1.0k citations), Gender Studies (169 citations) and Safety Research (132 citations). Dina G. Okamoto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kim Ebert, G. Cristina Mora, Paula England, Elisabeth S. Clemens, Walter W. Powell, Hugh Mehan, Irene Villanueva, Angela Lintz, Lea Hubbard and Lynn Smith‐Lovin. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and American Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.