Angela Lintz
About
In The Last Decade
Angela Lintz
3 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Education 328
- Sociology and Political Science 141
- Safety Research 39
- Linguistics and Language 27
- Clinical Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Angela Lintz
This map shows the geographic impact of Angela Lintz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angela Lintz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angela Lintz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angela Lintz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angela Lintz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angela Lintz. The network helps show where Angela Lintz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angela Lintz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angela Lintz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angela Lintz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angela Lintz. Angela Lintz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 210 | |
| 2 | 175 | |
| 3 | Tracking Untracking: The Consequences of Placing Low Track Students in High Track Classes | 15 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.