Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century.
19751.5k citationsMichael Hechter, Immanuel WallersteinContemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviewsprofile →
Principles of Group Solidarity
1989530 citationsJames Stolzman, Michael HechterThe Canadian Journal of Sociologyprofile →
Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development.
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hechter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hechter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hechter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hechter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hechter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hechter. The network helps show where Michael Hechter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Hechter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Hechter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Hechter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Hechter. Michael Hechter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baron, James N., Michael T. Hannan, Neil Fligstein, et al.. (2016). The Impact of Economics on Contemporary Sociology. Journal of Economic Literature. 32(3). 1111–1146.18 indexed citations
Siroky, David S., Sean Mueller, & Michael Hechter. (2014). Religious Legacies, Political Preferences and Intergroup Bargaining: The Case of Jura. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
8.
Hechter, Michael, Danielle Novetsky Friedman, & Satoshi Kanazawa. (2012). The Attainment of Global Order in Heterogeneous Societies. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
9.
Hechter, Michael. (2009). Legitimacy in the Modern World. American Behavioral Scientist. 53(3). 279–288.35 indexed citations
10.
Kalyvas, Stathis N., Robert H. Bates, Michael Hechter, et al.. (2008). Order, Conflict, and Violence. Cambridge University Press eBooks.136 indexed citations
Hechter, Michael & Christine Horne. (2003). Theories of social order : a reader. Stanford University Press eBooks.36 indexed citations
13.
Quinn, Kevin M., et al.. (2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War Revisited ∗.4 indexed citations
14.
Hechter, Michael, et al.. (2002). The Genesis of Values. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 31(5). 604–604.
15.
Stolzman, James & Michael Hechter. (1989). Principles of Group Solidarity. The Canadian Journal of Sociology. 14(2). 244–244.530 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.