Meta van der Linden
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Communication
- Clinical Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Laura JacobsColette van LaarMarc HoogheThomas de VroomeJaco DagevosBoele De RaadJan Pieter van OudenhovenCarmen Carmona Rodríguez
- Topics
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration (8 papers)Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Meta van der Linden
13 papers receiving 139 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Sociology and Political Science 115
- Social Psychology 31
- Communication 31
- Clinical Psychology 21
- Political Science and International Relations 20
Countries citing papers authored by Meta van der Linden
This map shows the geographic impact of Meta van der Linden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meta van der Linden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meta van der Linden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meta van der Linden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meta van der Linden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meta van der Linden. The network helps show where Meta van der Linden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meta van der Linden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meta van der Linden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meta van der Linden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meta van der Linden. Meta van der Linden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | The secondary transfer effect of inter-racial contact on whites and blacks’ receptivity toward immigrants in the United States | 2 |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | Explaining parent-child similarity in different types of prejudice: The role of family socialization mechanisms | 2 |
| 15 | 20 |
About Meta van der Linden
Meta van der Linden is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 143 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (8 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (115 citations) and Social Psychology (31 citations). Meta van der Linden has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Laura Jacobs, Colette van Laar, Marc Hooghe, Thomas de Vroome, Jaco Dagevos, Boele De Raad, Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven, Carmen Carmona Rodríguez, Linda R. Tropp and Helen B. Marrow. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Ethnic and Racial Studies and European Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.