Kim Ebert
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Papers in
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 12
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 4
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research 2
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 2
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 8
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 2
- Co-authors
- Dina G. Okamoto (7 shared papers)Sarah M. Ovink (2 shared papers)Robert Heinich (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Behavioral Scientist (4 papers)Social Problems (3 papers)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (2 papers)Social Currents (1 paper)Sociological Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kim Ebert
19 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Communication 38
- Sociology and Political Science 236
- Public Administration 14
- Political Science and International Relations 71
- Demography 28
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Ebert. The network helps show where Kim Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Kim Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | Legal Barriers to Educational Technology and Instructional Productivity. Final Report. | 1976 | 4 |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Kim Ebert
Kim Ebert is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Communication and Law, having authored 20 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (12 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (38 citations), Sociology and Political Science (236 citations), Public Administration (14 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and Demography (28 citations). Kim Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dina G. Okamoto, Sarah M. Ovink and Robert Heinich. Their work appears in journals such as American Behavioral Scientist, Social Problems, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Currents and Sociological Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.