Deborah L. Smith‐Shank
- Education top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Art Education and Development (14 papers)Digital Storytelling and Education (6 papers)Digital Media and Visual Art (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Deborah L. Smith‐Shank
23 papers receiving 542 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Education 320
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 182
- Sociology and Political Science 137
- Literature and Literary Theory 75
- Social Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah L. Smith‐Shank
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah L. Smith‐Shank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah L. Smith‐Shank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah L. Smith‐Shank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah L. Smith‐Shank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah L. Smith‐Shank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah L. Smith‐Shank. The network helps show where Deborah L. Smith‐Shank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah L. Smith‐Shank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah L. Smith‐Shank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah L. Smith‐Shank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah L. Smith‐Shank. Deborah L. Smith‐Shank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lewis Hine and His Photo Stories: Visual Culture and Social Reform | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Visual Culture and Issues-based Curricula | 2 |
| 5 | Who’s in Bed with the Handmaiden? | 2 |
| 6 | Our Grandmother's Daughters: The Work of Cynthia Hellyer Heinz | 1 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Youth Fantasies: The Perverse Landscape of the Media | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Semiotics and Visual Culture: Sights, Signs, and Significance. | 48 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Searching for the Semiotic Self. | 3 |
| 17 | 499 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Deborah L. Smith‐Shank
Deborah L. Smith‐Shank is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Speech and Hearing and Museology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Education and Development (14 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (6 papers) and Digital Media and Visual Art (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (182 citations), Music (57 citations) and Education (320 citations). Deborah L. Smith‐Shank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Elliot W. Eisner, Paul Duncum, Diane Kinder and James E. Sanders. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Computing Research, Studies in Art Education and Semiotica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.