Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning
19721.0k citationsElliot W. Eisner et al.Studies in Art Educationprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Elliot W. Eisner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elliot W. Eisner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliot W. Eisner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliot W. Eisner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elliot W. Eisner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliot W. Eisner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliot W. Eisner. The network helps show where Elliot W. Eisner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elliot W. Eisner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elliot W. Eisner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elliot W. Eisner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elliot W. Eisner. Elliot W. Eisner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (2003). Artistry in Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 47(3). 373–384.36 indexed citations
2.
Eisner, Elliot W., et al.. (2003). Protecting Our Children from the Arts.. The American school board journal. 190(10). 28–31.4 indexed citations
3.
Eisner, Elliot W. & Kimberly Powell. (2002). Art In Science. Curriculum Inquiry. 32(2). 131–159.35 indexed citations
4.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (2002). What Can Education Learn from the Arts About the Practice of Education. Journal of curriculum and supervision. 18(1). 4–16.79 indexed citations
5.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1999). The Uses and Limits of Performance Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(9). 658.56 indexed citations
6.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1999). Arts Education for the 21st Century.. Kappa Delta Pi Record. 35(3).1 indexed citations
7.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1997). Cognition and Representation: A Way To Pursue the American Dream?.. Phi Delta Kappan. 78(5). 348.41 indexed citations
8.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1994). Do American Schools Need Standards. The School Administrator. 51(5). 8.2 indexed citations
9.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1994). Commentary: Putting Multiple Intelligences in Context: Some Questions and Observations.. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 95(4). 555–560.10 indexed citations
10.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1991). Taking a Second Look: Educational Connoisseurship Revisited. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 92(6). 168–187.17 indexed citations
11.
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1990). Who Decides What Schools Teach. Phi Delta Kappan. 71(7).15 indexed citations
Eisner, Elliot W.. (1969). The Humanities: Is a New Era Possible?.. Educational leadership.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.