Buffy Stahl

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Buffy Stahl is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Buffy Stahl has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Molecular Biology, 14 papers in Food Science and 7 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Buffy Stahl's work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (14 papers), Gut microbiota and health (10 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (7 papers). Buffy Stahl is often cited by papers focused on Probiotics and Fermented Foods (14 papers), Gut microbiota and health (10 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (7 papers). Buffy Stahl collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom. Buffy Stahl's co-authors include Rodolphe Barrangou, Wesley Morovic, Ashley A. Hibberd, Monika de Arruda, Guy Plunkett, György Pósfai, Kinga Umenhoffer, Brian C. Thomas, Valerie Burland and David Frisch and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Buffy Stahl

23 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Emergent Properties of Reduced-Genome Escherichia coli 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Buffy Stahl United States 18 1.4k 569 435 352 192 23 1.8k
Dusko Ehrlich France 14 931 0.7× 462 0.8× 401 0.9× 280 0.8× 143 0.7× 19 1.5k
Éric Guédon France 31 1.5k 1.1× 991 1.7× 444 1.0× 263 0.7× 282 1.5× 63 2.3k
Christine Delorme France 25 1.6k 1.1× 1.1k 2.0× 463 1.1× 254 0.7× 345 1.8× 48 2.2k
Jan‐Peter van Pijkeren United States 21 1.3k 1.0× 799 1.4× 374 0.9× 295 0.8× 337 1.8× 39 1.9k
Udo Wegmann United Kingdom 21 957 0.7× 649 1.1× 197 0.5× 285 0.8× 244 1.3× 37 1.4k
Calum J. Walsh Ireland 18 1.1k 0.8× 498 0.9× 146 0.3× 200 0.6× 135 0.7× 36 1.6k
Francesco Celandroni Italy 25 1.0k 0.7× 520 0.9× 247 0.6× 358 1.0× 100 0.5× 67 1.7k
Cristiano G. Moreira Brazil 18 1.0k 0.7× 506 0.9× 391 0.9× 170 0.5× 100 0.5× 35 2.0k
S. Dusko Ehrlich France 21 1.9k 1.3× 1.3k 2.3× 656 1.5× 398 1.1× 414 2.2× 31 2.6k
Ulla Svensson Sweden 23 755 0.5× 476 0.8× 425 1.0× 129 0.4× 361 1.9× 41 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Buffy Stahl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Buffy Stahl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buffy Stahl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buffy Stahl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Buffy Stahl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buffy Stahl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buffy Stahl. The network helps show where Buffy Stahl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Buffy Stahl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Buffy Stahl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Buffy Stahl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Buffy Stahl. Buffy Stahl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jackson, Scott A., Jean L. Schoeni, Marco Pane, et al.. (2019). Improving End-User Trust in the Quality of Commercial Probiotic Products. Frontiers in Microbiology. 10. 739–739. 133 indexed citations
2.
Lehtinen, Markus J., Ashley A. Hibberd, Sofia Männikkö, et al.. (2018). Nasal microbiota clusters associate with inflammatory response, viral load, and symptom severity in experimental rhinovirus challenge. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 11411–11411. 44 indexed citations
4.
Hibberd, Ashley A., Christian Clement Yde, Maren Ziegler, et al.. (2018). Probiotic or synbiotic alters the gut microbiota and metabolism in a randomised controlled trial of weight management in overweight adults. Beneficial Microbes. 10(2). 121–136. 127 indexed citations
6.
Mukerji, Pushkor, Jason M. Roper, Buffy Stahl, et al.. (2016). Safety evaluation of AB-LIFE® (Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529): Antibiotic resistance and 90-day repeated-dose study in rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 92. 117–128. 37 indexed citations
7.
Morovic, Wesley, et al.. (2016). Genotyping by PCR and High-Throughput Sequencing of Commercial Probiotic Products Reveals Composition Biases. Frontiers in Microbiology. 7. 1747–1747. 75 indexed citations
8.
Ouwehand, Arthur C., Sofia D. Forssten, Ashley A. Hibberd, Anna Lyra, & Buffy Stahl. (2016). Probiotic approach to prevent antibiotic resistance. Annals of Medicine. 48(4). 246–255. 141 indexed citations
9.
Páez-Espino, David, Itai Sharon, Wesley Morovic, et al.. (2015). CRISPR Immunity Drives Rapid Phage Genome Evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. mBio. 6(2). 160 indexed citations
10.
Hamilton, Joshua J., et al.. (2014). Genome –Scale Reconstruction of Metabolic Networks of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 and 12A. PLoS ONE. 9(11). e110785–e110785. 29 indexed citations
11.
Páez-Espino, David, Wesley Morovic, Christine Sun, et al.. (2013). Strong bias in the bacterial CRISPR elements that confer immunity to phage. Nature Communications. 4(1). 1430–1430. 140 indexed citations
12.
Barrangou, Rodolphe, et al.. (2013). Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis ATCC 27673 Is a Genomically Unique Strain within Its Conserved Subspecies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 79(22). 6903–6910. 27 indexed citations
13.
Stahl, Buffy & Rodolphe Barrangou. (2013). Complete Genome Sequence of Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14. Genome Announcements. 1(3). 22 indexed citations
14.
Broadbent, Jeffery R., Eric C Neeno-Eckwall, Buffy Stahl, et al.. (2012). Analysis of the Lactobacillus casei supragenome and its influence in species evolution and lifestyle adaptation. BMC Genomics. 13(1). 533–533. 116 indexed citations
15.
Shukla, Sanjay K., Buffy Stahl, Mary E. Stemper, et al.. (2012). Comparative Whole-Genome Mapping To Determine Staphylococcus aureus Genome Size, Virulence Motifs, and Clonality. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 50(11). 3526–3533. 16 indexed citations
16.
Schwan, William R., Buffy Stahl, Emily B. Zentz, et al.. (2010). Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups. Microbiology. 156(7). 2124–2135. 19 indexed citations
17.
Pósfai, György, Guy Plunkett, Tamás Fehér, et al.. (2006). Emergent Properties of Reduced-Genome Escherichia coli. Science. 312(5776). 1044–1046. 526 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Boehm, Günther, Silvia Fanaro, Giorgio Moro, et al.. (2004). Prebiotic oligosaccharides in infant nutrition: Effects on intestinal flora. 15(5). 14–16. 7 indexed citations
19.
Edwards, Christine A., Corinne Rumney, Michael Davies, et al.. (2003). A Human Flora‐Associated Rat Model of the Breast‐Fed Infant Gut. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 37(2). 168–177. 1 indexed citations
20.
Edwards, Christine A., Corinne Rumney, Michael Davies, et al.. (2003). A Human Flora-Associated Rat Model of the Breast-Fed Infant Gut. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 37(2). 168–177. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026