Bret G. Range

500 total citations
27 papers, 278 citations indexed

About

Bret G. Range is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bret G. Range has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 278 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Education, 5 papers in Information Systems and Management and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Bret G. Range's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (16 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (13 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (5 papers). Bret G. Range is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (16 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (13 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (5 papers). Bret G. Range collaborates with scholars based in United States, Algeria and Canada. Bret G. Range's co-authors include Heather E. Duncan, Ian M. Mette, Jason Anderson, Courtney McKim, Suzanne Young, Christine Langé, Mary Alice Bruce, Clifford P. Harbour, Jeff Jones and Craig E. Shepherd and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, School Leadership and Management and Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth.

In The Last Decade

Bret G. Range

26 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bret G. Range United States 10 243 49 28 22 19 27 278
Bernard Badiali United States 7 223 0.9× 21 0.4× 30 1.1× 18 0.8× 22 1.2× 29 242
Edward Crowe United States 6 242 1.0× 38 0.8× 21 0.8× 19 0.9× 29 1.5× 10 291
Lisa Gaikhorst Netherlands 10 218 0.9× 34 0.7× 20 0.7× 30 1.4× 27 1.4× 22 265
Mitchell D. Chester United States 7 232 1.0× 38 0.8× 33 1.2× 18 0.8× 43 2.3× 10 284
Brendan Bartanen United States 9 260 1.1× 63 1.3× 23 0.8× 45 2.0× 19 1.0× 22 315
Bradley S. Portin United States 11 279 1.1× 73 1.5× 44 1.6× 10 0.5× 20 1.1× 22 315
Luke C. Miller United States 9 247 1.0× 45 0.9× 12 0.4× 23 1.0× 15 0.8× 27 282
Dana L. Bickmore United States 9 255 1.0× 31 0.6× 44 1.6× 22 1.0× 60 3.2× 28 296
Naida C. Tushnet United States 6 266 1.1× 56 1.1× 31 1.1× 21 1.0× 17 0.9× 15 303
Tim Waters 5 206 0.8× 38 0.8× 23 0.8× 8 0.4× 19 1.0× 6 238

Countries citing papers authored by Bret G. Range

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bret G. Range's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret G. Range with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret G. Range more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bret G. Range

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret G. Range. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret G. Range. The network helps show where Bret G. Range may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bret G. Range

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bret G. Range. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bret G. Range based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bret G. Range. Bret G. Range is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2019). An Explanation of the Supervisory Model used by Elementary Principal Supervisors in the State of Missouri. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
2.
Mette, Ian M., et al.. (2017). The Wicked Problem of the Intersection between Supervision and Evaluation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 32 indexed citations
3.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2015). The Views of Novice and Late Career Principals Concerning Instructional and Organizational Leadership within Their Evaluation.. Planning and changing. 46. 109–126. 10 indexed citations
4.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2015). Principals' Perceptions Regarding Their Supervision and Evaluation.. 12(2). 20–33. 2 indexed citations
5.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2015). Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems. Planning and changing. 46. 158–174. 6 indexed citations
6.
Mette, Ian M., et al.. (2015). Teachers' Perceptions of Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: A Reflection of School Improvement Practices in the Age of Reform.. 16(1). 16–30. 28 indexed citations
7.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2014). Teachers' Perceptions Based on Tenure Status and Gender about Principals' Supervision.. BearWorks (Missouri State University). 9(1). 5 indexed citations
8.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2014). Aspiring Principals' Perspectives about Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Insights for Educational Leadership Preparation Programs.. 15(1). 1–17. 6 indexed citations
9.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2013). How Faculty Supervise and Mentor Pre-service Teachers: Implications for Principal Supervision of Novice Teachers. ˜The œinternational journal of educational leadership preparation. 8(2). 43–58. 15 indexed citations
10.
Duncan, Heather E., et al.. (2013). Exploring Student Perceptions of Rigor Online: Toward a Definition of Rigorous Learning.. Journal on excellence in college teaching. 24(4). 5–28. 6 indexed citations
11.
Shepherd, Craig E., et al.. (2013). Implications for Educational Leaders as They Consider Technology Development.. Planning and changing. 44. 73–86. 4 indexed citations
12.
Range, Bret G.. (2013). How Teachers' Perceive Principal Supervision and Evaluation in Eight Elementary Schools.. 23(2). 65–78. 6 indexed citations
13.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2013). Engaging Middle-Grade Students to Learn in a Caring Community. The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas. 86(2). 48–52. 3 indexed citations
14.
Langé, Christine, et al.. (2012). Conditions for Effective Data Use to Improve Schools: Recommendations for School Leaders.. ˜The œinternational journal of educational leadership preparation. 7(3). 11 indexed citations
15.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2012). Teaching about the Principal and School Counselor Relationship: ELCC 2.1a.. ˜The œinternational journal of educational leadership preparation. 7(2). 3 indexed citations
16.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2012). The Perceptions of Primary Grade Teachers and Elementary Principals about the Effectiveness of Grade-Level Retention. 36(1). 15 indexed citations
17.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2011). Preservice Teacher Beliefs about Retention: How Do They Know What They Don't Know?.. 21(2). 77–99. 6 indexed citations
18.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2011). Rethinking Grade Retention and Academic Redshirting: Helping School Administrators Make Sense of What Works.. ˜The œinternational journal of educational leadership preparation. 6(2). 4 indexed citations
19.
Duncan, Heather E., et al.. (2011). From Professional Preparation to On-the-Job Development: What Do Beginning Principals Need?.. ˜The œinternational journal of educational leadership preparation. 6(3). 18 indexed citations
20.
Range, Bret G., et al.. (2009). Longitudinal Literature Review on Grade Retention.. ˜The œinternational journal of educational leadership preparation. 4(2). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026