Bram Bruggeman

549 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Bram Bruggeman is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Bram Bruggeman has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Bram Bruggeman's work include Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Technology-Enhanced Education Studies (2 papers). Bram Bruggeman is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Technology-Enhanced Education Studies (2 papers). Bram Bruggeman collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Kenya. Bram Bruggeman's co-authors include Jo Tondeur, Bram Pynoo, Katrien Struyven, Anja Garone, Silke Vanslambrouck, Céline Cocquyt, Johan van Braak, Joke Voogt, Natalie Pareja Roblin and Brent Philipsen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Internet and Higher Education and British Journal of Educational Technology.

In The Last Decade

Bram Bruggeman

7 papers receiving 315 citations

Hit Papers

Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implemen... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bram Bruggeman Belgium 6 219 92 72 57 35 8 339
Anja Garone Belgium 6 200 0.9× 73 0.8× 74 1.0× 52 0.9× 36 1.0× 10 339
Santosh Panda India 9 235 1.1× 64 0.7× 63 0.9× 36 0.6× 27 0.8× 27 317
Mahboobe Mehrvarz Iran 5 119 0.5× 119 1.3× 54 0.8× 36 0.6× 22 0.6× 10 268
José Alberto Lencastre Portugal 9 253 1.2× 138 1.5× 99 1.4× 45 0.8× 41 1.2× 50 432
Anissa M. Bettayeb United Arab Emirates 5 111 0.5× 73 0.8× 58 0.8× 47 0.8× 31 0.9× 8 256
Francesca Amenduni Italy 7 137 0.6× 94 1.0× 54 0.8× 27 0.5× 17 0.5× 34 270
Haozhe Jiang China 9 154 0.7× 58 0.6× 98 1.4× 29 0.5× 57 1.6× 20 368
Yue Zhu China 5 238 1.1× 83 0.9× 138 1.9× 60 1.1× 38 1.1× 8 405
Louis B. Swartz United States 5 242 1.1× 65 0.7× 86 1.2× 27 0.5× 47 1.3× 13 320
Anchalee Ngampornchai United States 3 193 0.9× 66 0.7× 26 0.4× 44 0.8× 22 0.6× 8 274

Countries citing papers authored by Bram Bruggeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bram Bruggeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bram Bruggeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bram Bruggeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bram Bruggeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bram Bruggeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bram Bruggeman. The network helps show where Bram Bruggeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bram Bruggeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bram Bruggeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bram Bruggeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bram Bruggeman. Bram Bruggeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Tondeur, Jo, et al.. (2025). Bridging higher educators’ beliefs and practice in online education: A qualitative systematic review. Computers and Education Open. 9. 100286–100286.
2.
Bruggeman, Bram, Anja Garone, Katrien Struyven, Bram Pynoo, & Jo Tondeur. (2022). Exploring university teachers’ online education during COVID-19: Tensions between enthusiasm and stress. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100095–100095. 30 indexed citations
3.
Garone, Anja, Bram Bruggeman, Brent Philipsen, et al.. (2022). Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Education and Information Technologies. 27(6). 7599–7628. 13 indexed citations
4.
Bruggeman, Bram, et al.. (2022). Negotiating teacher educators' beliefs about blended learning: Using stimulated recall to explore design choices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 100–114. 11 indexed citations
5.
Bruggeman, Bram, Jo Tondeur, Katrien Struyven, et al.. (2020). Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 48. 100772–100772. 160 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Garone, Anja, Bram Pynoo, Jo Tondeur, et al.. (2019). Clustering university teaching staff through UTAUT: Implications for the acceptance of a new learning management system. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50(5). 2466–2483. 85 indexed citations
7.
Roblin, Natalie Pareja, et al.. (2018). Practical considerations informing teachers’ technology integration decisions: the case of tablet PCs. Technology Pedagogy and Education. 27(2). 165–181. 36 indexed citations
8.
Hal, Guido Van, et al.. (2017). Happy teachers and happy school children: going hand in hand. European Journal of Public Health. 27(suppl_3). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026