Louis B. Swartz
- Education top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Michele T. ColeDaniel J. Shelley
- Topics
- Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers)Online and Blended Learning (5 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers)
- Journals
- The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed LearningInternational Journal of Information and Communication Technology EducationEDULEARN proceedings
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Louis B. Swartz
12 papers receiving 279 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Education 242
- Computer Science Applications 86
- Information Systems 65
- Clinical Psychology 47
- Social Psychology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Louis B. Swartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis B. Swartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis B. Swartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis B. Swartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis B. Swartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis B. Swartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis B. Swartz. The network helps show where Louis B. Swartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis B. Swartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis B. Swartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis B. Swartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis B. Swartz. Louis B. Swartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | University Students and E-Learning: Are they really satisfied? | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year studybreakdown → | 264 |
| 7 | Students' Perception of Academic Integrity in Online Business Education Courses | 9 |
| 8 | UNDERSTANDING ACADEMIC INTEGRITY IN THE ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT: A SURVEY OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS STUDENTS | 7 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Students’ Perceptions of Academic Integrity in the Online Learning Environment | 1 |
| 11 | Online vs. In-Class Teaching: Comparing and Analyzing Effectiveness | 3 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 18 |
About Louis B. Swartz
Louis B. Swartz is a scholar working on Safety Research, Information Systems and Management and Law, having authored 13 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (86 citations), Education (242 citations) and Information Systems and Management (27 citations). Louis B. Swartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michele T. Cole and Daniel J. Shelley. Their work appears in journals such as The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education and EDULEARN proceedings.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.