Anuj Shah

5.8k total citations · 4 hit papers
48 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Anuj Shah is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Anuj Shah has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in General Decision Sciences, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Anuj Shah's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). Anuj Shah is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). Anuj Shah collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Anuj Shah's co-authors include Sendhil Mullainathan, Eldar Shafir, Daniel M. Oppenheimer, Michael Yeomans, Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Vladas Griskevicius, Chiraag Mittal, Debora V. Thompson and Sara Heller and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Anuj Shah

44 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

Some Consequences of Having Too Little 2008 2026 2014 2020 2012 2008 2019 2018 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anuj Shah United States 18 801 650 544 536 451 48 3.2k
Scott Highhouse United States 37 1.5k 1.8× 1.1k 1.6× 684 1.3× 481 0.9× 561 1.2× 106 6.6k
Cynthia Cryder United States 17 1.2k 1.5× 665 1.0× 305 0.6× 355 0.7× 735 1.6× 29 3.1k
Nina Mažar United States 20 692 0.9× 298 0.5× 459 0.8× 604 1.1× 651 1.4× 62 2.9k
Amar Cheema United States 18 1.2k 1.5× 743 1.1× 379 0.7× 397 0.7× 1.1k 2.5× 36 3.6k
William P. Bottom United States 17 1.4k 1.7× 744 1.1× 1.0k 1.9× 565 1.1× 179 0.4× 63 4.0k
Sandra L. Schneider United States 24 962 1.2× 564 0.9× 848 1.6× 468 0.9× 395 0.9× 70 4.2k
James P. Byrnes United States 32 802 1.0× 747 1.1× 434 0.8× 350 0.7× 136 0.3× 73 5.5k
Stefan Palan Austria 11 742 0.9× 444 0.7× 199 0.4× 483 0.9× 215 0.5× 42 2.8k
Jonathan Levav United States 18 824 1.0× 565 0.9× 428 0.8× 386 0.7× 820 1.8× 42 2.6k
Nancy Welch United States 12 1.7k 2.1× 603 0.9× 1.1k 1.9× 570 1.1× 204 0.5× 54 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Anuj Shah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anuj Shah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anuj Shah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anuj Shah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anuj Shah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anuj Shah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anuj Shah. The network helps show where Anuj Shah may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anuj Shah

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anuj Shah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anuj Shah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anuj Shah. Anuj Shah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rugo, Hope S., Peter Schmid, Sara M. Tolaney, et al.. (2024). Health-related quality of life with sacituzumab govitecan in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in the phase III TROPiCS-02 trial. The Oncologist. 29(9). 768–779. 7 indexed citations
2.
Zeidan, Amer M., Elizabeth S. Mearns, Carmen D. Ng, et al.. (2023). Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Anemia With Excess Blasts (RAEB) Who Receive Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia. 24(3). 177–186. 2 indexed citations
3.
Shah, Anuj & Min P. Kim. (2023). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in 2023. Thoracic surgery clinics/Thorac. surg. clin.. 33(2). 125–134. 2 indexed citations
4.
Shah, Anuj, et al.. (2022). Knowledge about others reduces one’s own sense of anonymity. Nature. 603(7900). 297–301. 4 indexed citations
5.
Shah, Anuj, Duc T. Nguyen, Ray Chihara, et al.. (2021). A novel EndoFLIP marker during hiatal hernia repair is associated with short-term postoperative dysphagia. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(7). 4764–4770. 7 indexed citations
6.
Ouss, Aurélie, et al.. (2020). Behavioral nudges reduce failure to appear for court. Science. 370(6517). 63 indexed citations
7.
Shah, Anuj, et al.. (2019). Non-Infectious Reservoir-Related Complications During and After Penile Prosthesis Placement. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 7(3). 521–529. 23 indexed citations
8.
Hamilton, Rebecca W., Debora V. Thompson, Sterling A. Bone, et al.. (2018). The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 47(3). 532–550. 248 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Koerner, John D., Dessislava Markova, Brian Calio, et al.. (2018). The local cytokine and growth factor response to recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) after spinal fusion. The Spine Journal. 18(8). 1424–1433. 13 indexed citations
10.
Shah, Anuj, et al.. (2017). Integrative Medicine and Mood, Emotions and Mental Health. Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice. 44(2). 281–304. 6 indexed citations
11.
Shah, Anuj & Jens Ludwig. (2016). Option Awareness: The Psychology of What We Consider. American Economic Review. 106(5). 425–429. 7 indexed citations
12.
Heller, Sara, Anuj Shah, Jonathan Guryan, et al.. (2015). Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago. NBER Working Paper 21178.. National Bureau of Economic Research. 10 indexed citations
13.
Shah, Anuj, Eldar Shafir, & Sendhil Mullainathan. (2014). How Scarcity Frames Value. ACR North American Advances. 2 indexed citations
14.
Shah, Anuj, et al.. (2014). Medical-Legal Partnership in Medical Education: Pathways and Opportunities. Journal of Legal Medicine. 35(1). 149–177. 7 indexed citations
15.
Shah, Anuj, Sendhil Mullainathan, & Eldar Shafir. (2012). Some Consequences of Having Too Little. Science. 338(6107). 682–685. 897 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Shah, Anuj & Daniel M. Oppenheimer. (2011). Grouping information for judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 140(1). 1–13. 14 indexed citations
17.
Zhao, Jiaying, Anuj Shah, & Daniel N. Osherson. (2009). On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability. Cognition. 113(1). 26–36. 21 indexed citations
18.
Oppenheimer, Daniel M., Anuj Shah, & Adam L. Alter. (2008). Fluency and Psychological Distance. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 30(30). 1 indexed citations
19.
Shah, Anuj & Daniel M. Oppenheimer. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework.. Psychological Bulletin. 134(2). 207–222. 656 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Green, Leonard, Joel Myerson, Anuj Shah, Sara J. Estle, & Daniel D. Holt. (2007). DO ADJUSTING‐AMOUNT AND ADJUSTING‐DELAY PROCEDURES PRODUCE EQUIVALENT ESTIMATES OF SUBJECTIVE VALUE IN PIGEONS?. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 87(3). 337–347. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026