Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys
2018248 citationsRebecca W. Hamilton, Debora V. Thompson et al.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Sterling A. Bone
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sterling A. Bone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sterling A. Bone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sterling A. Bone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sterling A. Bone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sterling A. Bone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sterling A. Bone. The network helps show where Sterling A. Bone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sterling A. Bone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sterling A. Bone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sterling A. Bone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sterling A. Bone. Sterling A. Bone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hamilton, Rebecca W., Debora V. Thompson, Sterling A. Bone, et al.. (2018). The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 47(3). 532–550.248 indexed citations breakdown →
Voorhees, Clay M., et al.. (2013). Managing Post-Purchase Moments of Truth: Leveraging Customer Feedback to Increase Loyalty. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 14.8 indexed citations
15.
Larson, Jeffrey & Sterling A. Bone. (2012). A New Customer Typology for Adaptive Selling. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).1 indexed citations
16.
Sampson, Scott E., Larry J. Menor, & Sterling A. Bone. (2010). Why We Need a Service Logic: A Comparative Review. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 15(3). 18.4 indexed citations
Bone, Sterling A., Glenn L. Christensen, & Jerome D. Williams. (2010). When Consumer Well-Being Meets Small Business Ownership: Transforming Financial Service Systems to Eradicate Disparate Treatment and Discrimination. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).5 indexed citations
19.
Larson, Jeffrey & Sterling A. Bone. (2009). Attention Vulnerable Shoppers: Measuring Consumer Attitudes Toward Salespeople. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
20.
Bone, Sterling A., Katherine N. Lemon, Katie A. Liljenquist, & R. Bruce Money. (2008). The Power of a ‘Thank You’: The Influence of Customer Compliments on Customer Loyalty. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.