António Cervero
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Ana BernardoMaría EstebanEllián Tuero HerreroJoana R. CasanovaLeandro S. AlmeidaJosé Carlos NúñezAdrián Castro-LópezMaría Victoria Hernández Pérez
- Topics
- Educational Outcomes and Influences (10 papers)Higher Education Research Studies (8 papers)Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEFrontiers in Psychology
In The Last Decade
António Cervero
28 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 328
- Social Psychology 140
- Computer Science Applications 108
- Information Systems 86
- Clinical Psychology 49
Countries citing papers authored by António Cervero
This map shows the geographic impact of António Cervero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by António Cervero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites António Cervero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by António Cervero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by António Cervero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by António Cervero. The network helps show where António Cervero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of António Cervero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of António Cervero. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of António Cervero based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with António Cervero. António Cervero is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | La transición a la universidad: eficacia de un programa de orientación en bachillerato apoyado en las tic | 1 |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About António Cervero
António Cervero is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Outcomes and Influences (10 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (8 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (108 citations), Education (328 citations) and Social Psychology (140 citations). António Cervero has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Ana Bernardo, María Esteban, Ellián Tuero Herrero, Joana R. Casanova, Leandro S. Almeida, José Carlos Núñez, Adrián Castro-López, María Victoria Hernández Pérez, Júlio António González-Pienda and Alejandro Díaz Mújica. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.