Anicia Peters

1.5k citations
52 papers · 989 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anicia Peters

51 papers receiving 965 citations

Peers

Anicia Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Human-Computer Interaction 356
  • Computer Science Applications 341
  • Software 83
  • Information Systems 290
  • Communication 84
Replace Gilly Leshed with:
Gilly Leshed United States
Betsy DiSalvo United States
Andri Ioannou Cyprus
Anders I. Mørch Norway
Symeon Retalis Greece
Robert L. Mack United States
Sally Fincher United Kingdom
Davinia Hernández‐Leo Spain
Nora McDonald United States
Sarah Kuhn United States
Anicia Peters relative to Gilly Leshed United States Gilly Leshed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Gilly Leshed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anicia Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anicia Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anicia Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anicia Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anicia Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anicia Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anicia Peters. The network helps show where Anicia Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anicia Peters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anicia Peters Line = papers co-authored together Anicia Peters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016163
2 201584
3 201884
4 201969
5 202167
6 201664
7 201753
8 202052
9 201541
10 201825
11 201522
12 201722
13 201616
14 201415
15 201615
16 201213
17 201812
18 201412
19 202011
20 201110

About Anicia Peters

Anicia Peters is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 52 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (14 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (13 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (10 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (6 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (356 citations), Computer Science Applications (341 citations), Software (83 citations), Information Systems (290 citations) and Communication (84 citations). Anicia Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Namibia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Burnett, Raymond Pettit, James Prather, Simone Stumpf, Irwin Kwan, Brian E. Mennecke, John Homer, Maxine S. Cohen, Heike Winschiers‐Theophilus and Laura Beckwith. Their work appears in journals such as interactions, Business Horizons, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing and Interacting with Computers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact